Studying Delusions Within Research Domain Criteria

The Challenge of Configural Traits When Building a Mechanistic Foundation for Abnormal Beliefs

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Our understanding of belief formation, maintenance, and change is in its infancy, yet it is absolutely essential to make progress in understanding these processes to parse the puzzle of psychotic delusions. In this companion to Bebbington and Freeman, I consider a number of Research Domain Criteria constructs that may be helpful for exploring these processes but ultimately conclude (following Risen) that delusions are likely the result of several systems failing. I close with 4 recommendations for making progress: (1) prepare to study a variable space defined by several relevant constructs, (2) include the study of "unsanctioned" constructs, (3) examine the relationships between brain regions, rather than the local abnormalities, and (4) develop rigorous computational models of delusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-262
Number of pages3
JournalSchizophrenia Bulletin
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Delusions
Research
Maintenance
Brain

Keywords

  • Research Domain Criteria
  • cognitive control
  • delusions
  • prediction error
  • review

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Cite this

@article{b2f4b70977ab4d93a9069441ef2939f6,
title = "Studying Delusions Within Research Domain Criteria: The Challenge of Configural Traits When Building a Mechanistic Foundation for Abnormal Beliefs",
abstract = "Our understanding of belief formation, maintenance, and change is in its infancy, yet it is absolutely essential to make progress in understanding these processes to parse the puzzle of psychotic delusions. In this companion to Bebbington and Freeman, I consider a number of Research Domain Criteria constructs that may be helpful for exploring these processes but ultimately conclude (following Risen) that delusions are likely the result of several systems failing. I close with 4 recommendations for making progress: (1) prepare to study a variable space defined by several relevant constructs, (2) include the study of {"}unsanctioned{"} constructs, (3) examine the relationships between brain regions, rather than the local abnormalities, and (4) develop rigorous computational models of delusions.",
keywords = "Research Domain Criteria, cognitive control, delusions, prediction error, review",
author = "Angus MacDonald",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/schbul/sbw190",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "260--262",
journal = "Schizophrenia Bulletin",
issn = "0586-7614",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Studying Delusions Within Research Domain Criteria

T2 - The Challenge of Configural Traits When Building a Mechanistic Foundation for Abnormal Beliefs

AU - MacDonald, Angus

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Our understanding of belief formation, maintenance, and change is in its infancy, yet it is absolutely essential to make progress in understanding these processes to parse the puzzle of psychotic delusions. In this companion to Bebbington and Freeman, I consider a number of Research Domain Criteria constructs that may be helpful for exploring these processes but ultimately conclude (following Risen) that delusions are likely the result of several systems failing. I close with 4 recommendations for making progress: (1) prepare to study a variable space defined by several relevant constructs, (2) include the study of "unsanctioned" constructs, (3) examine the relationships between brain regions, rather than the local abnormalities, and (4) develop rigorous computational models of delusions.

AB - Our understanding of belief formation, maintenance, and change is in its infancy, yet it is absolutely essential to make progress in understanding these processes to parse the puzzle of psychotic delusions. In this companion to Bebbington and Freeman, I consider a number of Research Domain Criteria constructs that may be helpful for exploring these processes but ultimately conclude (following Risen) that delusions are likely the result of several systems failing. I close with 4 recommendations for making progress: (1) prepare to study a variable space defined by several relevant constructs, (2) include the study of "unsanctioned" constructs, (3) examine the relationships between brain regions, rather than the local abnormalities, and (4) develop rigorous computational models of delusions.

KW - Research Domain Criteria

KW - cognitive control

KW - delusions

KW - prediction error

KW - review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026287300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026287300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbw190

DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbw190

M3 - Review article

VL - 43

SP - 260

EP - 262

JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin

JF - Schizophrenia Bulletin

SN - 0586-7614

IS - 2

ER -