Structural and Spectroscopic Comparison of Soft-Se vs. Hard-O Donor Bonding in Trivalent Americium/Neodymium Molecules

Conrad A.P. Goodwin, Anthony W. Schlimgen, Thomas E. Albrecht-Schönzart, Enrique R. Batista, Andrew J. Gaunt, Michael T. Janicke, Stosh A. Kozimor, Brian L. Scott, Lauren M. Stevens, Frankie D. White, Ping Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Covalency is often considered to be an influential factor in driving An3+ vs. Ln3+ selectivity invoked by soft donor ligands. This is intensely debated, particularly the extent to which An3+/Ln3+ covalency differences prevail and manifest as the f-block is traversed, and the effects of periodic breaks beyond Pu. Herein, two Am complexes, [Am{N(E=PPh2)2}3] (1-Am, E=Se; 2-Am, E=O) are compared to isoradial [Nd{N(E=PPh2)2}3] (1-Nd, 2-Nd) complexes. Covalent contributions are assessed and compared to U/La and Pu/Ce analogues. Through ab initio calculations grounded in UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray structures, we observe differences in f orbital involvement between Am–Se and Nd–Se bonds, which are not present in O-donor congeners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9459-9466
Number of pages8
JournalAngewandte Chemie - International Edition
Volume60
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 19 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH

Keywords

  • actinides
  • americium
  • covalency
  • spectroscopy
  • structure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structural and Spectroscopic Comparison of Soft-Se vs. Hard-O Donor Bonding in Trivalent Americium/Neodymium Molecules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this