Abstract
In this essay we introduce a new tool for studying the patterns of sentential reference within the framework introduced in [2] and known as the language of paradox: Strong-homomorphisms. In particular, we show that (i) strong-homomorphisms between constructions preserve paradoxicality, (ii) many (but not all) earlier results regarding the paradoxicality of constructions can be recast as special cases of our central result regarding strong-homomorphisms, and (iii) that we can use strong-homomorphisms to provide a simple demonstration of the paradoxical nature of a well-known paradox that has not received much attention in this context: The McGee paradox. In addition, along the way we will highlight how strong-homomorphisms highlight novel connections between the graph-theoretic analyses of paradoxes mobilized in the framework and the methods and tools of category theory.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1070-1093 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Review of Symbolic Logic |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 30 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic.
Keywords
- Liar paradox
- McGee paradox
- category theory
- language of paradox