Stone V. Ritter and the expanding duty of loyalty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stone v. Ritter is the first post-Disney Delaware Supreme Court case articulating the doctrine of good faith. Taking Stone v. Ritter as a point of departure, we propose a way of understanding how good faith fits within the broader context of Delaware fiduciary duty cases. We see potential cases as arrayed along a continuum from traditional care cases to traditional loyalty cases. In between are cases where director or officer objectivity is impaired, but less so than in traditional loyalty cases. The emerging law of good faith helps courts deal with such cases. Particular clusters of cases develop detailed guidance for certain recurring problematic situations-the adoption of takeover defenses, board responses to shareholder derivative suits, the approval of executive compensation, and so on. At the same time, a more general doctrine of good faith is emerging, one that provides an expressive handle on which to ground future holdings and encourage the development of appropriate norms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1769-1796
Number of pages28
JournalFordham Law Review
Volume76
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

loyalty
faith
doctrine
shareholder
objectivity
Supreme Court
director
Law

Cite this

Stone V. Ritter and the expanding duty of loyalty. / Hill, Claire; McDonnell, Brett H.

In: Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 3, 01.12.2007, p. 1769-1796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6aaf43cec1964d8491a57063ad86dce5,
title = "Stone V. Ritter and the expanding duty of loyalty",
abstract = "Stone v. Ritter is the first post-Disney Delaware Supreme Court case articulating the doctrine of good faith. Taking Stone v. Ritter as a point of departure, we propose a way of understanding how good faith fits within the broader context of Delaware fiduciary duty cases. We see potential cases as arrayed along a continuum from traditional care cases to traditional loyalty cases. In between are cases where director or officer objectivity is impaired, but less so than in traditional loyalty cases. The emerging law of good faith helps courts deal with such cases. Particular clusters of cases develop detailed guidance for certain recurring problematic situations-the adoption of takeover defenses, board responses to shareholder derivative suits, the approval of executive compensation, and so on. At the same time, a more general doctrine of good faith is emerging, one that provides an expressive handle on which to ground future holdings and encourage the development of appropriate norms.",
author = "Claire Hill and McDonnell, {Brett H}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1769--1796",
journal = "Fordham Law Review",
issn = "0015-704X",
publisher = "Fordham University School of Law",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stone V. Ritter and the expanding duty of loyalty

AU - Hill, Claire

AU - McDonnell, Brett H

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Stone v. Ritter is the first post-Disney Delaware Supreme Court case articulating the doctrine of good faith. Taking Stone v. Ritter as a point of departure, we propose a way of understanding how good faith fits within the broader context of Delaware fiduciary duty cases. We see potential cases as arrayed along a continuum from traditional care cases to traditional loyalty cases. In between are cases where director or officer objectivity is impaired, but less so than in traditional loyalty cases. The emerging law of good faith helps courts deal with such cases. Particular clusters of cases develop detailed guidance for certain recurring problematic situations-the adoption of takeover defenses, board responses to shareholder derivative suits, the approval of executive compensation, and so on. At the same time, a more general doctrine of good faith is emerging, one that provides an expressive handle on which to ground future holdings and encourage the development of appropriate norms.

AB - Stone v. Ritter is the first post-Disney Delaware Supreme Court case articulating the doctrine of good faith. Taking Stone v. Ritter as a point of departure, we propose a way of understanding how good faith fits within the broader context of Delaware fiduciary duty cases. We see potential cases as arrayed along a continuum from traditional care cases to traditional loyalty cases. In between are cases where director or officer objectivity is impaired, but less so than in traditional loyalty cases. The emerging law of good faith helps courts deal with such cases. Particular clusters of cases develop detailed guidance for certain recurring problematic situations-the adoption of takeover defenses, board responses to shareholder derivative suits, the approval of executive compensation, and so on. At the same time, a more general doctrine of good faith is emerging, one that provides an expressive handle on which to ground future holdings and encourage the development of appropriate norms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39349105422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39349105422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:39349105422

VL - 76

SP - 1769

EP - 1796

JO - Fordham Law Review

JF - Fordham Law Review

SN - 0015-704X

IS - 3

ER -