Stigmata of hemorrhage in bleeding ulcers

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Models for predicting rebleeding after upper GI bleeding, and practice guidelines to determine management of these patients, must include not only endoscopic findings but clinical variables, such as severity of blood loss and the age and comorbidity of the patient. The importance of these variables in determining rebleeding risk, and the high degree of interobserver variability in identifying stigmata of hemorrhage, suggest that management strategies based too heavily on stigmata result in inappropriate discharge of some patients. The validity of various management strategies incorporating stigmata of hemorrhage needs to be prospectively assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)559-574
Number of pages16
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stigmata of hemorrhage in bleeding ulcers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this