Step return versus net reward in the voluntary provision of a threshold public good: An adversarial collaboration

Charles Bram Cadsby, Rachel Croson, Melanie Marks, Elizabeth Maynes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research concerns how costs and benefits affect the voluntary provision of threshold public goods. Cadsby and Maynes (J. Public Econ. 71:53-73, 1999) hypothesized that the difference between the value and cost of such a good, its net reward, influences the likelihood of provision. Croson and Marks (Exp. Econ. 2:239-259, 2000) focused on the ratio of group payoff to total cost, the step return. We find that step return is the best predictor overall, although net reward has some impact, negatively affecting the probability of provision with inexperienced participants and positively affecting it with experienced participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-289
Number of pages13
JournalPublic Choice
Volume135
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We would like to thank Fei Song, Nat Wilcox and participants at the Economic Science Association meetings for helpful comments. Diana Shores and Janet Sanchez-Stuart provided excellent research assistance. Cadsby and Maynes gratefully acknowledge funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, grant #410-2001-1590. Croson gratefully acknowledges funding from the National Science Foundation, grant #SBR-9876079.

Keywords

  • Adversarial collaboration
  • Experiment
  • Net reward
  • Step return
  • Threshold public good

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Step return versus net reward in the voluntary provision of a threshold public good: An adversarial collaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this