Abstract
Evaluation of various statistical methods to describe accurately associations between exposures and disease are constantly being explored. Spline regression has been suggested as an alternative to using categorized variables in studies of disease etiology, as it uses all data points to estimate the shape of the association between a given exposure and disease outcome. It has been proposed that this method is especially beneficial when associations are concentrated in a small range of the overall distribution of the exposure. In this study, we use data from a large case-control study of colon cancer to evaluate associations obtained from logistic regression models that use spline regression for main exposure and confounder effects with those that use categorized variables for main exposure. Our results show that for variables for which the association appears to be linear, such as body size and dietary intake of calcium, fiber, and cholesterol, associations are similar when estimates are generated from spline or categorized variable models. For other variables, such as total energy intake, for which associations appear to be strongest in the upper end of the distribution, estimates of association appear to be conservative when using categorized variables. The data also suggest that selection of cut points for the categorized variables may have an impact on the associations observed. Spline regression appears to be useful to estimate the shape of the association between a given exposure and disease and may provide guidance as to the appropriateness of using categorized variables. The risk estimates from spline regression appear to be similar to those from traditional categorical methods. When effects are large or rapidly changing, spline models may more appropriately describe the association.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1223-1233 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1998 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study was funded by RO1 CA48998 to Dr. Slattery. Case identification and verification was supported by the Utah Cancer Registry, the Northern California Cancer Registry, the Sacramento Tumor Registry, and the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System. We acknowledge the contribution to the data collection of Sandra Edwards, Dr. Richard Kerber, Dr. Bette Caan, and Dr. John Potter. The contents of this manuscript do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Keywords
- Colon cancer
- Diet
- Energy intake
- Spline regression
- Statistics
- Tobacco