TY - JOUR
T1 - Sphincter-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Low-Lying Rectal Cancer
T2 - Techniques, Oncologic Outcomes, and Functional Results
AU - Bordeianou, Liliana
AU - Maguire, Lillias H
AU - Alavi, Karim
AU - Sudan, Ranjan
AU - Wise, Paul E.
AU - Kaiser, Andreas M.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Background: Rectal cancer management has evolved into a complex multimodality approach with survival, local recurrence, and quality of life parameters being the relevant endpoints. Surgical treatment for low rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the past 100 years. Discussion: Abdominoperineal resection, once the standard of care for all rectal cancers, has become much less frequently utilized as surgeons devise and test new techniques for preserving the sphincters, maintaining continuity, and performing oncologically sound ultra-low anterior or local resections. Progress in rectal cancer surgery has been driven by improved understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology of the disease, innovative surgical technique, improved technology, multimodality approaches, and increased appreciation of the patient's quality of life. The patient with a low rectal cancer, once almost universally destined for impotence and a colostomy, now has the real potential for improved survival, avoidance of a permanent stoma, and preservation of the normal route of defecation.
AB - Background: Rectal cancer management has evolved into a complex multimodality approach with survival, local recurrence, and quality of life parameters being the relevant endpoints. Surgical treatment for low rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the past 100 years. Discussion: Abdominoperineal resection, once the standard of care for all rectal cancers, has become much less frequently utilized as surgeons devise and test new techniques for preserving the sphincters, maintaining continuity, and performing oncologically sound ultra-low anterior or local resections. Progress in rectal cancer surgery has been driven by improved understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology of the disease, innovative surgical technique, improved technology, multimodality approaches, and increased appreciation of the patient's quality of life. The patient with a low rectal cancer, once almost universally destined for impotence and a colostomy, now has the real potential for improved survival, avoidance of a permanent stoma, and preservation of the normal route of defecation.
KW - Anterior resection
KW - Intersphincteric resection
KW - Local excision rectal cancer
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Sphincter preservation
KW - Total mesorectal excision
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902543373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902543373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11605-014-2528-y
DO - 10.1007/s11605-014-2528-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 24820137
AN - SCOPUS:84902543373
SN - 1091-255X
VL - 18
SP - 1358
EP - 1372
JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
IS - 7
ER -