TY - JOUR
T1 - Speech perception in gated noise
T2 - The effects of temporal resolution
AU - Jin, Su Hyun
AU - Nelson, Peggy B.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Previous investigations have suggested that hearing-impaired (HI) listeners have reduced masking release (MR) compared to normal hearing listeners (NH) when they listen in modulated noise. The current study examined the following questions that have not been clearly answered: First, when HI listeners are amplified so that their performance is equal to that of NH listeners in quiet and in steady noise, do HI listeners still show reduced MR with modulated noise when compared to NH listeners? Second, is the masking release the same for sentences and CV syllables? Third, does forward masking significantly contribute to the variability in performance among HI listeners? To compensate for reduced hearing sensitivity for HI listeners, the spectrum levels of both speech and noise were adjusted based on the individual hearing loss. There was no significant difference between the performance of NH listeners and that of HI listeners in steady noise and in quiet. However, the amount of MR for sentences and for CV syllables was significantly reduced for HI listeners. For sentence recognition, the amount of MR seemed to be more related to hearing sensitivity for low-to-mid frequencies than to forward masking. In contrast, forward masking thresholds appear to be a major contributor to the amount of MR for syllable recognition.
AB - Previous investigations have suggested that hearing-impaired (HI) listeners have reduced masking release (MR) compared to normal hearing listeners (NH) when they listen in modulated noise. The current study examined the following questions that have not been clearly answered: First, when HI listeners are amplified so that their performance is equal to that of NH listeners in quiet and in steady noise, do HI listeners still show reduced MR with modulated noise when compared to NH listeners? Second, is the masking release the same for sentences and CV syllables? Third, does forward masking significantly contribute to the variability in performance among HI listeners? To compensate for reduced hearing sensitivity for HI listeners, the spectrum levels of both speech and noise were adjusted based on the individual hearing loss. There was no significant difference between the performance of NH listeners and that of HI listeners in steady noise and in quiet. However, the amount of MR for sentences and for CV syllables was significantly reduced for HI listeners. For sentence recognition, the amount of MR seemed to be more related to hearing sensitivity for low-to-mid frequencies than to forward masking. In contrast, forward masking thresholds appear to be a major contributor to the amount of MR for syllable recognition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646458539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646458539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.2188688
DO - 10.1121/1.2188688
M3 - Article
C2 - 16708964
AN - SCOPUS:33646458539
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 119
SP - 3097
EP - 3108
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 5
ER -