Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Search content at Experts@Minnesota
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Sources of error in bone mineral density estimates from quantitative CT
Christina L. Brunnquell
, Carla Winsor
, H. Laura Aaltonen
, Scott Telfer
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
26
Link opens in a new tab
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sources of error in bone mineral density estimates from quantitative CT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Bone Mineral Density
100%
Quantitative Computed Tomography
100%
Error Sources
100%
Density Estimates
100%
Imaging Techniques
25%
Strength Measurement
25%
Bone Strength
25%
Treatment Monitoring
25%
Estimation Method
25%
Hip Bone
25%
Spine Bone
25%
Single-particle Energy
25%
Osteoporosis Treatment
25%
Opportunistic Screening
25%
Calibration Approach
25%
Diagnostic Tasks
25%
Repeatability Test
25%
Reproducibility Study
25%
Imaging Equipment
25%
Calibration Phantom
25%
Subject Calibration
25%
Nursing and Health Professions
Bone Density
100%
Imaging
75%
Computer Assisted Tomography
75%
Phantom
25%
Reproducibility
25%
Bone Strength
25%
Patient Monitoring
25%
Medicine and Dentistry
Bone Density
100%
Quantitative Computed Tomography
75%
Osteoporosis
25%
Reproducibility
25%
Imaging Technique
25%
Patient Monitoring
25%
Imaging Equipment
25%
Bone Strength
25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Bone Density
100%
Computed Tomography
75%
Bone Strength
25%
Repeatability
25%
Reproducibility
25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Bone Density
100%
Computer Assisted Tomography
75%
Bone Strength
25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Bone Density
100%
Quantitative Computed Tomography
75%
Vertebral Column
25%