TY - JOUR
T1 - Some algebra and geometry for hierarchical models, applied to diagnostics
AU - Hodges, James S.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Recent advances in computing make it practical to use complex hierarchical models. However, the complexity makes it difficult to see how features of the data determine the fitted model. This paper describes an approach to diagnostics for hierarchical models, specifically linear hierarchical models with additive normal or t-errors. The key is to express hierarchical models in the form of ordinary linear models by adding artificial 'cases' to the data set corresponding to the higher levels of the hierarchy. The error term of this linear model is not homoscedastic, but its covariance structure is much simpler than that usually used in variance component or random effects models. The re-expression has several advantages. First, it is extremely general, covering dynamic linear models, random effect and mixed effect models, and pairwise difference models, among others. Second, it makes more explicit the geometry of hierarchical models, by analogy with the geometry of linear models. Third, the analogy with linear models provides a rich source of ideas for diagnostics for all the parts of hierarchical models. This paper gives diagnostics to examine candidate added variables, transformations, collinearity, case influence arid residuals.
AB - Recent advances in computing make it practical to use complex hierarchical models. However, the complexity makes it difficult to see how features of the data determine the fitted model. This paper describes an approach to diagnostics for hierarchical models, specifically linear hierarchical models with additive normal or t-errors. The key is to express hierarchical models in the form of ordinary linear models by adding artificial 'cases' to the data set corresponding to the higher levels of the hierarchy. The error term of this linear model is not homoscedastic, but its covariance structure is much simpler than that usually used in variance component or random effects models. The re-expression has several advantages. First, it is extremely general, covering dynamic linear models, random effect and mixed effect models, and pairwise difference models, among others. Second, it makes more explicit the geometry of hierarchical models, by analogy with the geometry of linear models. Third, the analogy with linear models provides a rich source of ideas for diagnostics for all the parts of hierarchical models. This paper gives diagnostics to examine candidate added variables, transformations, collinearity, case influence arid residuals.
KW - Bayesian methods
KW - Dynamic linear models
KW - Multilevel models
KW - Random effect models
KW - Spatial data
KW - Time varying regression
KW - Variance components
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001750294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001750294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9868.00137
DO - 10.1111/1467-9868.00137
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0001750294
SN - 1369-7412
VL - 60
SP - 497
EP - 536
JO - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology
JF - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology
IS - 3
ER -