Abstract
Background: Total knee arthroplasty is a successful operation for treatment of arthritis. However, devastating wound complications and infections can compromise the knee joint, particularly in revision situations. Methods: Soft tissue loss associated with poor wound healing and multiple operations can necessitate the need for reconstruction for wound closure and protection of the prosthesis. Results: Coverage options range from simple closure methods to complex reconstruction, including delayed primary closure, healing by secondary intention, vacuum-assisted closure, skin grafting, local flap coverage, and distant microsurgical tissue transfer. Conclusion: Understanding the advantages and pitfalls of each reconstructive option helps to guide treatment and avoid repeated operations and potentially devastating consequences such as knee arthrodesis or amputation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1529-1538 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Arthroplasty |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords
- Flap
- Gastrocnemius
- Reconstruction
- Revision arthroplasty
- Total knee arthroplasty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Flap Coverage for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS