Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Societal relationships and gender role in homosexuals: A cross-cultural comparison

  • Michael W. Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The proposition that feminine gender role in male homosexuals is a function of societal sex roles and attitudes toward homosexuality, as well as parental factors, was examined by administering tests of gender role, gender role conservatism, and attitudes toward parents to a sample of 176 Swedish and 163 Australian homosexual men. With homo sexuality constant, it was found that feminine gender identity was more characteristic of the homosexuals in the more gender-role rigid and anti-homosexual society (Australia), independent of differences in perceptions of parents. This was taken to indicate support for the hypothesis that in anti-homosexual societies with rigid gender roles, opposite-sex gender identity in homosexuals will be, to some degree, a function of believing that heterosexual relationships are the only appropriate ones, and that individuals who are homosexual will thus validate same-sex preference by opposite-sex identification. The findings also support the more general hypothesis that gender role is based on societal, as well as parental, models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-288
Number of pages16
JournalThe Journal of Sex Research
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1983

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Michael W. Ross, PhD, is a Senior Demonstrator in Psychiatry at the Flinders University of South Australia Medical School, Adelaide, Australia. This research was assisted by a grant from the travel fund of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Melbourne. Requests for reprints should be sent to Michael Ross, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Flinders University Medical School, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Societal relationships and gender role in homosexuals: A cross-cultural comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this