Social support and health-related quality of life among gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer

Benjamin D Capistrant, Lindsey Lesher, Nidhi Kohli, Enyinnaya N. Merengwa, Badrinath R Konety, Darryl Mitteldorf, William G West, B. R. Simon Rosser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe social support patterns of gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer (GBMPCa) and how social support is associated with prostate cancer outcomes. SAMPLE & SETTING: A cross-sectional online survey with 186 GBMPCa recruited from a national cancer support group network. METHODS & VARIABLES: Descriptive statistics of social support and linear regression of social support on general and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QOL). Social support and health-related QOL were assessed generally and specific to prostate cancer. RESULTS: Participants primarily relied on partners or husbands, gay and bisexual friends, chosen family, and men from support groups for support. The most common types of support received were informational and emotional social support. Low general social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer symptom bother and general mental QOL. Wanting more social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer-specific and general QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians should be aware of the different social support networks and needs of GBMPCa and refer them to relevant support groups to improve QOL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-455
Number of pages17
JournalOncology nursing forum
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Social Support
Prostatic Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Self-Help Groups
Sexual Minorities
Spouses
Linear Models
Nursing
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Bisexual men
  • Caregiving
  • Homosexuality
  • Prostate cancer
  • Quality of life
  • Social support

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Cite this

Social support and health-related quality of life among gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer. / Capistrant, Benjamin D; Lesher, Lindsey; Kohli, Nidhi; Merengwa, Enyinnaya N.; Konety, Badrinath R; Mitteldorf, Darryl; West, William G; Rosser, B. R. Simon.

In: Oncology nursing forum, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 439-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Capistrant, Benjamin D ; Lesher, Lindsey ; Kohli, Nidhi ; Merengwa, Enyinnaya N. ; Konety, Badrinath R ; Mitteldorf, Darryl ; West, William G ; Rosser, B. R. Simon. / Social support and health-related quality of life among gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer. In: Oncology nursing forum. 2018 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 439-455.
@article{fb0f48148aac4ceca106e60638b889ea,
title = "Social support and health-related quality of life among gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To describe social support patterns of gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer (GBMPCa) and how social support is associated with prostate cancer outcomes. SAMPLE & SETTING: A cross-sectional online survey with 186 GBMPCa recruited from a national cancer support group network. METHODS & VARIABLES: Descriptive statistics of social support and linear regression of social support on general and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QOL). Social support and health-related QOL were assessed generally and specific to prostate cancer. RESULTS: Participants primarily relied on partners or husbands, gay and bisexual friends, chosen family, and men from support groups for support. The most common types of support received were informational and emotional social support. Low general social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer symptom bother and general mental QOL. Wanting more social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer-specific and general QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians should be aware of the different social support networks and needs of GBMPCa and refer them to relevant support groups to improve QOL.",
keywords = "Bisexual men, Caregiving, Homosexuality, Prostate cancer, Quality of life, Social support",
author = "Capistrant, {Benjamin D} and Lindsey Lesher and Nidhi Kohli and Merengwa, {Enyinnaya N.} and Konety, {Badrinath R} and Darryl Mitteldorf and West, {William G} and Rosser, {B. R. Simon}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1188/18.ONF.439-455",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "439--455",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "0190-535X",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social support and health-related quality of life among gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer

AU - Capistrant, Benjamin D

AU - Lesher, Lindsey

AU - Kohli, Nidhi

AU - Merengwa, Enyinnaya N.

AU - Konety, Badrinath R

AU - Mitteldorf, Darryl

AU - West, William G

AU - Rosser, B. R. Simon

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To describe social support patterns of gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer (GBMPCa) and how social support is associated with prostate cancer outcomes. SAMPLE & SETTING: A cross-sectional online survey with 186 GBMPCa recruited from a national cancer support group network. METHODS & VARIABLES: Descriptive statistics of social support and linear regression of social support on general and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QOL). Social support and health-related QOL were assessed generally and specific to prostate cancer. RESULTS: Participants primarily relied on partners or husbands, gay and bisexual friends, chosen family, and men from support groups for support. The most common types of support received were informational and emotional social support. Low general social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer symptom bother and general mental QOL. Wanting more social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer-specific and general QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians should be aware of the different social support networks and needs of GBMPCa and refer them to relevant support groups to improve QOL.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To describe social support patterns of gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer (GBMPCa) and how social support is associated with prostate cancer outcomes. SAMPLE & SETTING: A cross-sectional online survey with 186 GBMPCa recruited from a national cancer support group network. METHODS & VARIABLES: Descriptive statistics of social support and linear regression of social support on general and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QOL). Social support and health-related QOL were assessed generally and specific to prostate cancer. RESULTS: Participants primarily relied on partners or husbands, gay and bisexual friends, chosen family, and men from support groups for support. The most common types of support received were informational and emotional social support. Low general social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer symptom bother and general mental QOL. Wanting more social support was significantly associated with worse prostate cancer-specific and general QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians should be aware of the different social support networks and needs of GBMPCa and refer them to relevant support groups to improve QOL.

KW - Bisexual men

KW - Caregiving

KW - Homosexuality

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Quality of life

KW - Social support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049390165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049390165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/18.ONF.439-455

DO - 10.1188/18.ONF.439-455

M3 - Article

C2 - 29947351

AN - SCOPUS:85049390165

VL - 45

SP - 439

EP - 455

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 0190-535X

IS - 4

ER -