Abstract
It is no surprise that bioethics and sociology developed an adversarial relationship: bioethicists value the clear descriptions of ethically charged situations provided by social scientists, but doubt the ability of those trained in social science to logically derive and discern 'the good'. For their part, social scientists - experts in observing and collecting data about the way the world is - find bioethicists ignorant of the ways elegantly crafted solutions to ethical problems get altered when incarnated in varied social and cultural settings. This discipline-centred self-affirmation can be a satisfying exercise, but it offers nothing to the project of promoting more moral medicine and health care. The articles collected in this volume demonstrate the value of collaboration between social scientists and bioethicists. Focusing on four themes found in recent sociological research in bioethics - ethics of research, the creation of moral boundaries, bioethics and social policy, and the bioethical imagination - this anthology offers practical models of co-operative work where the strengths of each discipline are brought together to advance our understanding of bioethical issues and to show the way toward just and effective social policy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 665-677 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Sociology of Health and Illness |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bioethics
- Empirical ethics
- Interdisciplinary research
- Medical sociology
- Sociology of science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social science and bioethics: The way forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS