Social networks in complex human and natural systems: The case of rotational grazing, weak ties, and eastern US dairy landscapes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multifunctional agricultural systems seek to expand upon production-based benefits to enhance family wellbeing and animal health, reduce inputs, and improve environmental services such as biodiversity and water quality. However, in many countries a landscape-level conversion is uneven at best and stalled at worst. This is particularly true across the eastern rural landscape in the United States. We explore the role of social networks as drivers of system transformation within dairy production in the eastern United States, specifically rotational grazing as an alternative management option. We hypothesize the importance of weak ties within farmer social networks as drivers of change. In Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and New York, we conducted 53 interviews with confinement, low-intensity, and rotational grazing dairy producers as well as 35 interviews with associated network actors. Though confinement and grazier networks had similar proportions of strong and weak ties, confinement producers had more market-based weak ties, while graziers had more weak-ties to government agencies and other graziers in the region. These agency weak ties supported rotational graziers through information exchange and cost sharing, both crucial to farmers' transitions from confinement-based production to grazing systems. While weak ties were integral to initial innovation, farmers did not maintain these relationships beyond their transition to grazing. Of equal importance, grazier weak-tie networks did not include environmental organizations, suggesting unrealized potential for more diverse networks based on environmental services. By understanding the drivers, we can identify barriers to expanding weak tie networks and emergent properties in order to create institutions and policies necessary for change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-259
Number of pages15
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

rotational grazing
social networks
dairies
farmers
ecosystem services
interviews
grazing
government agencies
information exchange
Eastern United States
animal health
milk production
water quality
biodiversity
markets

Keywords

  • Dairy production
  • Landscape transitions
  • Multifunctional agriculture
  • Resilience
  • Social networks

Cite this

@article{9c1531807fb44158b0d330dc6bad29f2,
title = "Social networks in complex human and natural systems: The case of rotational grazing, weak ties, and eastern US dairy landscapes",
abstract = "Multifunctional agricultural systems seek to expand upon production-based benefits to enhance family wellbeing and animal health, reduce inputs, and improve environmental services such as biodiversity and water quality. However, in many countries a landscape-level conversion is uneven at best and stalled at worst. This is particularly true across the eastern rural landscape in the United States. We explore the role of social networks as drivers of system transformation within dairy production in the eastern United States, specifically rotational grazing as an alternative management option. We hypothesize the importance of weak ties within farmer social networks as drivers of change. In Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and New York, we conducted 53 interviews with confinement, low-intensity, and rotational grazing dairy producers as well as 35 interviews with associated network actors. Though confinement and grazier networks had similar proportions of strong and weak ties, confinement producers had more market-based weak ties, while graziers had more weak-ties to government agencies and other graziers in the region. These agency weak ties supported rotational graziers through information exchange and cost sharing, both crucial to farmers' transitions from confinement-based production to grazing systems. While weak ties were integral to initial innovation, farmers did not maintain these relationships beyond their transition to grazing. Of equal importance, grazier weak-tie networks did not include environmental organizations, suggesting unrealized potential for more diverse networks based on environmental services. By understanding the drivers, we can identify barriers to expanding weak tie networks and emergent properties in order to create institutions and policies necessary for change.",
keywords = "Dairy production, Landscape transitions, Multifunctional agriculture, Resilience, Social networks",
author = "Nelson, {Kristen C.} and Brummel, {Rachel F.} and Nicholas Jordan and Steven Manson",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-013-9462-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "245--259",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social networks in complex human and natural systems

T2 - The case of rotational grazing, weak ties, and eastern US dairy landscapes

AU - Nelson, Kristen C.

AU - Brummel, Rachel F.

AU - Jordan, Nicholas

AU - Manson, Steven

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Multifunctional agricultural systems seek to expand upon production-based benefits to enhance family wellbeing and animal health, reduce inputs, and improve environmental services such as biodiversity and water quality. However, in many countries a landscape-level conversion is uneven at best and stalled at worst. This is particularly true across the eastern rural landscape in the United States. We explore the role of social networks as drivers of system transformation within dairy production in the eastern United States, specifically rotational grazing as an alternative management option. We hypothesize the importance of weak ties within farmer social networks as drivers of change. In Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and New York, we conducted 53 interviews with confinement, low-intensity, and rotational grazing dairy producers as well as 35 interviews with associated network actors. Though confinement and grazier networks had similar proportions of strong and weak ties, confinement producers had more market-based weak ties, while graziers had more weak-ties to government agencies and other graziers in the region. These agency weak ties supported rotational graziers through information exchange and cost sharing, both crucial to farmers' transitions from confinement-based production to grazing systems. While weak ties were integral to initial innovation, farmers did not maintain these relationships beyond their transition to grazing. Of equal importance, grazier weak-tie networks did not include environmental organizations, suggesting unrealized potential for more diverse networks based on environmental services. By understanding the drivers, we can identify barriers to expanding weak tie networks and emergent properties in order to create institutions and policies necessary for change.

AB - Multifunctional agricultural systems seek to expand upon production-based benefits to enhance family wellbeing and animal health, reduce inputs, and improve environmental services such as biodiversity and water quality. However, in many countries a landscape-level conversion is uneven at best and stalled at worst. This is particularly true across the eastern rural landscape in the United States. We explore the role of social networks as drivers of system transformation within dairy production in the eastern United States, specifically rotational grazing as an alternative management option. We hypothesize the importance of weak ties within farmer social networks as drivers of change. In Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and New York, we conducted 53 interviews with confinement, low-intensity, and rotational grazing dairy producers as well as 35 interviews with associated network actors. Though confinement and grazier networks had similar proportions of strong and weak ties, confinement producers had more market-based weak ties, while graziers had more weak-ties to government agencies and other graziers in the region. These agency weak ties supported rotational graziers through information exchange and cost sharing, both crucial to farmers' transitions from confinement-based production to grazing systems. While weak ties were integral to initial innovation, farmers did not maintain these relationships beyond their transition to grazing. Of equal importance, grazier weak-tie networks did not include environmental organizations, suggesting unrealized potential for more diverse networks based on environmental services. By understanding the drivers, we can identify barriers to expanding weak tie networks and emergent properties in order to create institutions and policies necessary for change.

KW - Dairy production

KW - Landscape transitions

KW - Multifunctional agriculture

KW - Resilience

KW - Social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897096930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897096930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-013-9462-6

DO - 10.1007/s10460-013-9462-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897096930

VL - 31

SP - 245

EP - 259

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 2

ER -