Abstract
Biofilm formation is an important and ubiquitous mode of growth among bacteria. Central to the evolutionary advantage of biofilm formation is cell–cell and cell–surface adhesion achieved by a variety of factors, some of which are diffusible compounds that may operate as classical public goods—factors that are costly to produce but may benefit other cells. An outstanding question is how diffusible matrix production, in general, can be stable over evolutionary timescales. In this work, using Vibrio cholerae as a model, we show that shared diffusible biofilm matrix proteins are indeed susceptible to cheater exploitation and that the evolutionary stability of producing these matrix components fundamentally depends on biofilm spatial structure, intrinsic sharing mechanisms of these components, and flow conditions in the environment. We further show that exploitation of diffusible adhesion proteins is localized within a well-defined spatial range around cell clusters that produce them. Based on this exploitation range and the spatial distribution of cell clusters, we constructed a model of costly diffusible matrix production and related these length scales to the relatedness coefficient in social evolution theory. Our results show that production of diffusible biofilm matrix components is evolutionarily stable under conditions consistent with natural biofilm habitats and host environments. We expect the mechanisms revealed in this study to be relevant to other secreted factors that operate as cooperative public goods in bacterial communities and the concept of exploitation range and the associated analysis tools to be generally applicable.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | e2123469119 |
Pages (from-to) | e2123469119 |
Journal | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
Volume | 119 |
Issue number | 27 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 5 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank Andrew Sharo, Sara Siwiecki, and Carissa Chan for their help in the initial experiments. We thank Xin Huang, Japinder Nijjer, and Qiuting Zhang for helpful discussions. Alexandre Persat, Kevin Foster, Benjamin Wucher, and James Winans provided helpful feedback on the manuscript. S.M. thanks Paul Fischer, Som Dutta, and the Nek5000 user group for helpful discussions regarding numerical computations. Numerical computations were performed using the resources of the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute at the University of Minnesota. J.Y. holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. C.D.N. is supported by the Simons Foundation Award No. 826672. J.T. holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. J.-S.B.T. is a Damon Runyon Fellow supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Grant No. DRG-2446-21). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH under Award No. DP2GM146253 (awarded to J.Y.).
Funding Information:
Fellow supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Grant No. DRG-2446-21). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH under Award No. DP2GM146253 (awarded to J.Y.).
Funding Information:
Institute at the University of Minnesota. J.Y. holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. C.D.N. is supported by the Simons Foundation Award No. 826672. J.T. holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. J.-S.B.T. is a Damon Runyon
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 the Author(s).
Keywords
- adhesion protein
- biofilm
- matrix
- public goods dilemma
- social evolution
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't