Social Connectedness Factors that Facilitate Use of Healthcare Services

Comparison of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming and Cisgender Adolescents

Lindsay A. Taliaferro, Brittany M. Harder, Nik M. Lampe, Shannon K. Carter, Nic Rider, Marla E Eisenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare social connectedness factors that facilitate use of primary, dental, and mental healthcare services among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) and cisgender adolescents. Methods: Data from the cross-sectional 2016 Minnesota Student Survey were used to examine protective social connectedness factors associated with use of different healthcare services among matched samples of 1916 TGNC and 1916 cisgender youth. Stratified, logistic regression analyses were used to examine background characteristics and social connectedness factors (parent connectedness, connections to other nonparental adults, teacher–student relationships, and friend connections) associated with use of each healthcare service within the last year. Results: For TGNC youth, but not for cisgender youth, higher levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of primary (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.40-3.66) and dental (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.78-5.08) care services, and lower levels of connectedness to nonparental adults was associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93). Among cisgender youth, no protective factors were significantly associated with receipt of primary care services, higher levels of friend connections were associated with receipt of dental services (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10-3.09), and lower levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.40). Conclusions: To promote the health of TGNC youth, clinicians should understand the distinct factors associated with obtaining healthcare among this population such as the need for tailored efforts focused on strengthening connectedness between TGNC youth and their parents to facilitate receipt of needed care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)172-178
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pediatrics
Volume211
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Transgender Persons
Delivery of Health Care
Tooth
Deciduous Tooth
Primary Health Care
Parents
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Students
Health

Keywords

  • TGNC
  • dental care
  • mental health
  • primary care
  • protective factors
  • youth

Cite this

Social Connectedness Factors that Facilitate Use of Healthcare Services : Comparison of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming and Cisgender Adolescents. / Taliaferro, Lindsay A.; Harder, Brittany M.; Lampe, Nik M.; Carter, Shannon K.; Rider, Nic; Eisenberg, Marla E.

In: Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 211, 01.08.2019, p. 172-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3e259b5006b408ab88ff79f670eaac5,
title = "Social Connectedness Factors that Facilitate Use of Healthcare Services: Comparison of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming and Cisgender Adolescents",
abstract = "Objective: To compare social connectedness factors that facilitate use of primary, dental, and mental healthcare services among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) and cisgender adolescents. Methods: Data from the cross-sectional 2016 Minnesota Student Survey were used to examine protective social connectedness factors associated with use of different healthcare services among matched samples of 1916 TGNC and 1916 cisgender youth. Stratified, logistic regression analyses were used to examine background characteristics and social connectedness factors (parent connectedness, connections to other nonparental adults, teacher–student relationships, and friend connections) associated with use of each healthcare service within the last year. Results: For TGNC youth, but not for cisgender youth, higher levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of primary (OR, 2.26; 95{\%} CI, 1.40-3.66) and dental (OR, 3.01; 95{\%} CI, 1.78-5.08) care services, and lower levels of connectedness to nonparental adults was associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.55; 95{\%} CI, 0.33-0.93). Among cisgender youth, no protective factors were significantly associated with receipt of primary care services, higher levels of friend connections were associated with receipt of dental services (OR, 1.85; 95{\%} CI, 1.10-3.09), and lower levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.20; 95{\%} CI, 0.10-0.40). Conclusions: To promote the health of TGNC youth, clinicians should understand the distinct factors associated with obtaining healthcare among this population such as the need for tailored efforts focused on strengthening connectedness between TGNC youth and their parents to facilitate receipt of needed care.",
keywords = "TGNC, dental care, mental health, primary care, protective factors, youth",
author = "Taliaferro, {Lindsay A.} and Harder, {Brittany M.} and Lampe, {Nik M.} and Carter, {Shannon K.} and Nic Rider and Eisenberg, {Marla E}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "211",
pages = "172--178",
journal = "Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "0022-3476",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Connectedness Factors that Facilitate Use of Healthcare Services

T2 - Comparison of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming and Cisgender Adolescents

AU - Taliaferro, Lindsay A.

AU - Harder, Brittany M.

AU - Lampe, Nik M.

AU - Carter, Shannon K.

AU - Rider, Nic

AU - Eisenberg, Marla E

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Objective: To compare social connectedness factors that facilitate use of primary, dental, and mental healthcare services among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) and cisgender adolescents. Methods: Data from the cross-sectional 2016 Minnesota Student Survey were used to examine protective social connectedness factors associated with use of different healthcare services among matched samples of 1916 TGNC and 1916 cisgender youth. Stratified, logistic regression analyses were used to examine background characteristics and social connectedness factors (parent connectedness, connections to other nonparental adults, teacher–student relationships, and friend connections) associated with use of each healthcare service within the last year. Results: For TGNC youth, but not for cisgender youth, higher levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of primary (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.40-3.66) and dental (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.78-5.08) care services, and lower levels of connectedness to nonparental adults was associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93). Among cisgender youth, no protective factors were significantly associated with receipt of primary care services, higher levels of friend connections were associated with receipt of dental services (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10-3.09), and lower levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.40). Conclusions: To promote the health of TGNC youth, clinicians should understand the distinct factors associated with obtaining healthcare among this population such as the need for tailored efforts focused on strengthening connectedness between TGNC youth and their parents to facilitate receipt of needed care.

AB - Objective: To compare social connectedness factors that facilitate use of primary, dental, and mental healthcare services among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) and cisgender adolescents. Methods: Data from the cross-sectional 2016 Minnesota Student Survey were used to examine protective social connectedness factors associated with use of different healthcare services among matched samples of 1916 TGNC and 1916 cisgender youth. Stratified, logistic regression analyses were used to examine background characteristics and social connectedness factors (parent connectedness, connections to other nonparental adults, teacher–student relationships, and friend connections) associated with use of each healthcare service within the last year. Results: For TGNC youth, but not for cisgender youth, higher levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of primary (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.40-3.66) and dental (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.78-5.08) care services, and lower levels of connectedness to nonparental adults was associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93). Among cisgender youth, no protective factors were significantly associated with receipt of primary care services, higher levels of friend connections were associated with receipt of dental services (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10-3.09), and lower levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.40). Conclusions: To promote the health of TGNC youth, clinicians should understand the distinct factors associated with obtaining healthcare among this population such as the need for tailored efforts focused on strengthening connectedness between TGNC youth and their parents to facilitate receipt of needed care.

KW - TGNC

KW - dental care

KW - mental health

KW - primary care

KW - protective factors

KW - youth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065259129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065259129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.024

M3 - Article

VL - 211

SP - 172

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 0022-3476

ER -