Social and community inclusion outcomes for adults with autism with and without intellectual disability in Australia

L. A. Cameron, B. J. Tonge, P. Howlin, S. L. Einfeld, R. J. Stancliffe, K. M. Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Research suggests that adults with autism tend to have poor outcomes. Outcomes have mostly been defined using summary outcome ratings, with less focus on specific outcomes such as employment, living situation, social satisfaction, loneliness, and friendships. This study aimed to explore social and community outcomes, including employment, education, living arrangements, friendships, and social satisfaction, for autistic adults with and without intellectual disability. Method: Eighty-four adults with autism (mean age 34.2 years, SD = 4.5; 67% with co-occurring intellectual disability), recruited as children and adolescents, participated in the current study. Adult social and community inclusion outcomes were explored through interview and questionnaire, both parent/carer-report and self-report. Results: Participants predominantly lived with family or in supported accommodation, did not pursue higher education, and mostly participated in day activity programmes. Most had limited friendships as reported by parents/carers; however, self-report data (n = 28) indicated that adults were largely satisfied with their social relationships. Overall outcome was poor for 57%, and good/very good for 34%. Adults with intellectual disability generally had poorer outcomes. Conclusion: Autistic adults encountered numerous difficulties in leading an independent life. Adults with co-occurring intellectual disability were most likely to experience difficulties; however, outcomes ranged from poor to very good for adults without intellectual disability. Discrepancies in parent/carer-report and self-reported experiences of friendships highlight the need to ensure individual experiences are captured in addition to parent/carer-report. Appropriate resources and programmes are crucial for adults with autism to support them to have the choice to live independently.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)655-666
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume66
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Australian Research Council, grant DP150104369 awarded to Kylie M. Gray, Bruce J. Tonge, Stewart L. Einfeld, Patricia Howlin, and Roger J. Stancliffe. Lauren A. Cameron was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. The authors would like to thank the families who have granted us the privilege of being part of their lives.

Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Australian Research Council, grant DP150104369 awarded to Kylie M. Gray, Bruce J. Tonge, Stewart L. Einfeld, Patricia Howlin, and Roger J. Stancliffe. Lauren A. Cameron was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. The authors would like to thank the families who have granted us the privilege of being part of their lives. Open access publishing facilitated by Monash University, as part of the Wiley - Monash University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • adult
  • autism
  • community inclusion
  • outcome
  • social inclusion

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social and community inclusion outcomes for adults with autism with and without intellectual disability in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this