TY - JOUR
T1 - Six-month-old infants’ perception of the hollow face illusion
T2 - Evidence for a general convexity bias
AU - Corrow, Sherryse L.
AU - Mathison, Jordan
AU - Granrud, Carl E.
AU - Yonas, Albert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 a Pion publication.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Corrow, Granrud, Mathison, and Yonas (2011, Perception, 40, 1376–1383) found evidence that 6-month-old infants perceive the hollow face illusion. In the present study we asked whether 6-month-old infants perceive illusory depth reversal for a nonface object and whether infants’ perception of the hollow face illusion is affected by mask orientation inversion. In experiment 1 infants viewed a concave bowl, and their reaches were recorded under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. Infants reached to the bowl as if it were convex significantly more often in the monocular than in the binocular viewing condition. These results suggest that infants perceive illusory depth reversal with a nonface stimulus and that the infant visual system has a bias to perceive objects as convex. Infants in experiment 2 viewed a concave face-like mask in upright and inverted orientations. Infants reached to the display as if it were convex more in the monocular than in the binocular condition; however, mask orientation had no effect on reaching. Previous findings that adults’ perception of the hollow face illusion is affected by mask orientation inversion have been interpreted as evidence of storedknowledge influences on perception. However, we found no evidence of such influences in infants, suggesting that their perception of this illusion may not be affected by stored knowledge, and that perceived depth reversal is not face-specific in infants.
AB - Corrow, Granrud, Mathison, and Yonas (2011, Perception, 40, 1376–1383) found evidence that 6-month-old infants perceive the hollow face illusion. In the present study we asked whether 6-month-old infants perceive illusory depth reversal for a nonface object and whether infants’ perception of the hollow face illusion is affected by mask orientation inversion. In experiment 1 infants viewed a concave bowl, and their reaches were recorded under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. Infants reached to the bowl as if it were convex significantly more often in the monocular than in the binocular viewing condition. These results suggest that infants perceive illusory depth reversal with a nonface stimulus and that the infant visual system has a bias to perceive objects as convex. Infants in experiment 2 viewed a concave face-like mask in upright and inverted orientations. Infants reached to the display as if it were convex more in the monocular than in the binocular condition; however, mask orientation had no effect on reaching. Previous findings that adults’ perception of the hollow face illusion is affected by mask orientation inversion have been interpreted as evidence of storedknowledge influences on perception. However, we found no evidence of such influences in infants, suggesting that their perception of this illusion may not be affected by stored knowledge, and that perceived depth reversal is not face-specific in infants.
KW - Depth perception
KW - Hollow face illusion
KW - Hollow mask illusion
KW - Infant perception
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912041658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912041658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1068/p7689
DO - 10.1068/p7689
M3 - Article
C2 - 25638934
AN - SCOPUS:84912041658
SN - 0301-0066
VL - 43
SP - 1177
EP - 1190
JO - Perception
JF - Perception
IS - 11
ER -