TY - JOUR
T1 - Six artificial intelligence paradigms for tissue characterisation and classification of non-COVID-19 pneumonia against COVID-19 pneumonia in computed tomography lungs
AU - Saba, Luca
AU - Agarwal, Mohit
AU - Patrick, Anubhav
AU - Puvvula, Anudeep
AU - Gupta, Suneet K.
AU - Carriero, Alessandro
AU - Laird, John R.
AU - Kitas, George D.
AU - Johri, Amer M.
AU - Balestrieri, Antonella
AU - Falaschi, Zeno
AU - Paschè, Alessio
AU - Viswanathan, Vijay
AU - El-Baz, Ayman
AU - Alam, Iqbal
AU - Jain, Abhinav
AU - Naidu, Subbaram
AU - Oberleitner, Ronald
AU - Khanna, Narendra N.
AU - Bit, Arindam
AU - Fatemi, Mostafa
AU - Alizad, Azra
AU - Suri, Jasjit S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, CARS.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Background: COVID-19 pandemic has currently no vaccines. Thus, the only feasible solution for prevention relies on the detection of COVID-19-positive cases through quick and accurate testing. Since artificial intelligence (AI) offers the powerful mechanism to automatically extract the tissue features and characterise the disease, we therefore hypothesise that AI-based strategies can provide quick detection and classification, especially for radiological computed tomography (CT) lung scans. Methodology: Six models, two traditional machine learning (ML)-based (k-NN and RF), two transfer learning (TL)-based (VGG19 and InceptionV3), and the last two were our custom-designed deep learning (DL) models (CNN and iCNN), were developed for classification between COVID pneumonia (CoP) and non-COVID pneumonia (NCoP). K10 cross-validation (90% training: 10% testing) protocol on an Italian cohort of 100 CoP and 30 NCoP patients was used for performance evaluation and bispectrum analysis for CT lung characterisation. Results: Using K10 protocol, our results showed the accuracy in the order of DL > TL > ML, ranging the six accuracies for k-NN, RF, VGG19, IV3, CNN, iCNN as 74.58 ± 2.44%, 96.84 ± 2.6, 94.84 ± 2.85%, 99.53 ± 0.75%, 99.53 ± 1.05%, and 99.69 ± 0.66%, respectively. The corresponding AUCs were 0.74, 0.94, 0.96, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99 (p-values < 0.0001), respectively. Our Bispectrum-based characterisation system suggested CoP can be separated against NCoP using AI models. COVID risk severity stratification also showed a high correlation of 0.7270 (p < 0.0001) with clinical scores such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), further validating our AI models. Conclusions: We prove our hypothesis by demonstrating that all the six AI models successfully classified CoP against NCoP due to the strong presence of contrasting features such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, and pleural effusion in CoP patients. Further, our online system takes < 2 s for inference.
AB - Background: COVID-19 pandemic has currently no vaccines. Thus, the only feasible solution for prevention relies on the detection of COVID-19-positive cases through quick and accurate testing. Since artificial intelligence (AI) offers the powerful mechanism to automatically extract the tissue features and characterise the disease, we therefore hypothesise that AI-based strategies can provide quick detection and classification, especially for radiological computed tomography (CT) lung scans. Methodology: Six models, two traditional machine learning (ML)-based (k-NN and RF), two transfer learning (TL)-based (VGG19 and InceptionV3), and the last two were our custom-designed deep learning (DL) models (CNN and iCNN), were developed for classification between COVID pneumonia (CoP) and non-COVID pneumonia (NCoP). K10 cross-validation (90% training: 10% testing) protocol on an Italian cohort of 100 CoP and 30 NCoP patients was used for performance evaluation and bispectrum analysis for CT lung characterisation. Results: Using K10 protocol, our results showed the accuracy in the order of DL > TL > ML, ranging the six accuracies for k-NN, RF, VGG19, IV3, CNN, iCNN as 74.58 ± 2.44%, 96.84 ± 2.6, 94.84 ± 2.85%, 99.53 ± 0.75%, 99.53 ± 1.05%, and 99.69 ± 0.66%, respectively. The corresponding AUCs were 0.74, 0.94, 0.96, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99 (p-values < 0.0001), respectively. Our Bispectrum-based characterisation system suggested CoP can be separated against NCoP using AI models. COVID risk severity stratification also showed a high correlation of 0.7270 (p < 0.0001) with clinical scores such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), further validating our AI models. Conclusions: We prove our hypothesis by demonstrating that all the six AI models successfully classified CoP against NCoP due to the strong presence of contrasting features such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, and pleural effusion in CoP patients. Further, our online system takes < 2 s for inference.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Bispectrum
KW - COVID-19
KW - Computer tomography
KW - Deep learning
KW - Ground-glass opacities
KW - Lung
KW - Machine learning
KW - Pandemic
KW - Performance
KW - Transfer learning
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100416771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100416771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11548-021-02317-0
DO - 10.1007/s11548-021-02317-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 33532975
AN - SCOPUS:85100416771
SN - 1861-6410
VL - 16
SP - 423
EP - 434
JO - International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
JF - International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
IS - 3
ER -