Sins of omission versus commission: Cross-cultural differences in brand-switching due to dissatisfaction induced by individual versus group action and inaction

Sharon Ng, Hakkyun Kim, Akshay R Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine how brand-switching varies across cultures, depending on the drivers of a prior unsatisfactory consumption experience. We draw from the literature on regret, norm theory and cross-cultural psychology to predict that Westerners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of their inaction relative to the inaction of a group to which they belong. In contrast, it is predicted that Easterners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of inaction on the part of the group to which they belong relative to their own inaction. We discuss the relevance of our research for marketing theory, the need to account for cultural differences in consumer segments, and the implications for organizations targeting culturally distinct market segments, both domestically and internationally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-100
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Marketing
Emotions
Psychology
Research
Dissatisfaction
Cross-cultural differences
Brand switching
Consumption experience

Keywords

  • Action-inaction
  • Brand-switching
  • Culture
  • Group decision-making
  • Multinational marketing strategies
  • Regret

Cite this

@article{a6cc1ab39d0a4ab48a0625875883d5fa,
title = "Sins of omission versus commission: Cross-cultural differences in brand-switching due to dissatisfaction induced by individual versus group action and inaction",
abstract = "We examine how brand-switching varies across cultures, depending on the drivers of a prior unsatisfactory consumption experience. We draw from the literature on regret, norm theory and cross-cultural psychology to predict that Westerners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of their inaction relative to the inaction of a group to which they belong. In contrast, it is predicted that Easterners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of inaction on the part of the group to which they belong relative to their own inaction. We discuss the relevance of our research for marketing theory, the need to account for cultural differences in consumer segments, and the implications for organizations targeting culturally distinct market segments, both domestically and internationally.",
keywords = "Action-inaction, Brand-switching, Culture, Group decision-making, Multinational marketing strategies, Regret",
author = "Sharon Ng and Hakkyun Kim and Rao, {Akshay R}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcps.2014.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "89--100",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sins of omission versus commission

T2 - Cross-cultural differences in brand-switching due to dissatisfaction induced by individual versus group action and inaction

AU - Ng, Sharon

AU - Kim, Hakkyun

AU - Rao, Akshay R

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - We examine how brand-switching varies across cultures, depending on the drivers of a prior unsatisfactory consumption experience. We draw from the literature on regret, norm theory and cross-cultural psychology to predict that Westerners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of their inaction relative to the inaction of a group to which they belong. In contrast, it is predicted that Easterners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of inaction on the part of the group to which they belong relative to their own inaction. We discuss the relevance of our research for marketing theory, the need to account for cultural differences in consumer segments, and the implications for organizations targeting culturally distinct market segments, both domestically and internationally.

AB - We examine how brand-switching varies across cultures, depending on the drivers of a prior unsatisfactory consumption experience. We draw from the literature on regret, norm theory and cross-cultural psychology to predict that Westerners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of their inaction relative to the inaction of a group to which they belong. In contrast, it is predicted that Easterners are more likely to switch brands when the unsatisfactory consumption experience is a consequence of inaction on the part of the group to which they belong relative to their own inaction. We discuss the relevance of our research for marketing theory, the need to account for cultural differences in consumer segments, and the implications for organizations targeting culturally distinct market segments, both domestically and internationally.

KW - Action-inaction

KW - Brand-switching

KW - Culture

KW - Group decision-making

KW - Multinational marketing strategies

KW - Regret

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920148628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920148628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.07.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84920148628

VL - 25

SP - 89

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

IS - 1

ER -