Single-sourcing versus multisourcing

The roles of output verifiability on task modularity

Shantanu Bhattacharya, Alok Gupta, Sameer Hasija

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares two modes for outsourcing the development of information services projects: singlesourcing (where one vendor handles all outsourced activities) and multisourcing (where multiple vendors handle those activities). We assess the relative efficacy of these two outsourcing modes by identifying the effects of three factors: task modularity, the extent of alignment between a (verifiable) performance metric and project revenue, and the extent to which project revenue is itself verifiable. We find that if tasks are modular then multisourcing strictly dominates single-sourcing-provided the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are not completely aligned. Yet if tasks are integrated, then the choice of sourcing mode is more nuanced: the best choice depends on trade-offs among the alignment between performance metric and project revenue, the verifiability of project revenue, and moral hazard. If the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are perfectly aligned, or if project revenue is completely verifiable, then firms prefer single-sourcing because it entails less moral hazard than does multisourcing. Comparative statistics for the effects of task interdependence costs and vendors' risk aversion reveal that multisourcing (single-sourcing) should be preferred when there are interdependence costs (/when vendors are strongly risk averse).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1171-1186
Number of pages16
JournalMIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Outsourcing
Hazards
Information services
Revenue
Modularity
Sourcing
Verifiability
Costs
Statistics
Vendors
Performance metrics
Moral hazard
Alignment
Trade-offs
Task interdependence
Efficacy
Factors
Risk aversion
Risk-averse
Integrated

Keywords

  • Effort interdependence
  • IT outsourcing
  • Multisourcing
  • Revenue verifiability
  • Revenue-metric alignment
  • Single-sourcing
  • Task modularity

Cite this

Single-sourcing versus multisourcing : The roles of output verifiability on task modularity. / Bhattacharya, Shantanu; Gupta, Alok; Hasija, Sameer.

In: MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 1171-1186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34925196c94f4d1280230f04e1e72abd,
title = "Single-sourcing versus multisourcing: The roles of output verifiability on task modularity",
abstract = "This paper compares two modes for outsourcing the development of information services projects: singlesourcing (where one vendor handles all outsourced activities) and multisourcing (where multiple vendors handle those activities). We assess the relative efficacy of these two outsourcing modes by identifying the effects of three factors: task modularity, the extent of alignment between a (verifiable) performance metric and project revenue, and the extent to which project revenue is itself verifiable. We find that if tasks are modular then multisourcing strictly dominates single-sourcing-provided the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are not completely aligned. Yet if tasks are integrated, then the choice of sourcing mode is more nuanced: the best choice depends on trade-offs among the alignment between performance metric and project revenue, the verifiability of project revenue, and moral hazard. If the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are perfectly aligned, or if project revenue is completely verifiable, then firms prefer single-sourcing because it entails less moral hazard than does multisourcing. Comparative statistics for the effects of task interdependence costs and vendors' risk aversion reveal that multisourcing (single-sourcing) should be preferred when there are interdependence costs (/when vendors are strongly risk averse).",
keywords = "Effort interdependence, IT outsourcing, Multisourcing, Revenue verifiability, Revenue-metric alignment, Single-sourcing, Task modularity",
author = "Shantanu Bhattacharya and Alok Gupta and Sameer Hasija",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.25300/MISQ/2018/14067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1171--1186",
journal = "MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems",
issn = "0276-7783",
publisher = "Management Information Systems Research Center",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-sourcing versus multisourcing

T2 - The roles of output verifiability on task modularity

AU - Bhattacharya, Shantanu

AU - Gupta, Alok

AU - Hasija, Sameer

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - This paper compares two modes for outsourcing the development of information services projects: singlesourcing (where one vendor handles all outsourced activities) and multisourcing (where multiple vendors handle those activities). We assess the relative efficacy of these two outsourcing modes by identifying the effects of three factors: task modularity, the extent of alignment between a (verifiable) performance metric and project revenue, and the extent to which project revenue is itself verifiable. We find that if tasks are modular then multisourcing strictly dominates single-sourcing-provided the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are not completely aligned. Yet if tasks are integrated, then the choice of sourcing mode is more nuanced: the best choice depends on trade-offs among the alignment between performance metric and project revenue, the verifiability of project revenue, and moral hazard. If the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are perfectly aligned, or if project revenue is completely verifiable, then firms prefer single-sourcing because it entails less moral hazard than does multisourcing. Comparative statistics for the effects of task interdependence costs and vendors' risk aversion reveal that multisourcing (single-sourcing) should be preferred when there are interdependence costs (/when vendors are strongly risk averse).

AB - This paper compares two modes for outsourcing the development of information services projects: singlesourcing (where one vendor handles all outsourced activities) and multisourcing (where multiple vendors handle those activities). We assess the relative efficacy of these two outsourcing modes by identifying the effects of three factors: task modularity, the extent of alignment between a (verifiable) performance metric and project revenue, and the extent to which project revenue is itself verifiable. We find that if tasks are modular then multisourcing strictly dominates single-sourcing-provided the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are not completely aligned. Yet if tasks are integrated, then the choice of sourcing mode is more nuanced: the best choice depends on trade-offs among the alignment between performance metric and project revenue, the verifiability of project revenue, and moral hazard. If the verifiable performance metric and project revenue are perfectly aligned, or if project revenue is completely verifiable, then firms prefer single-sourcing because it entails less moral hazard than does multisourcing. Comparative statistics for the effects of task interdependence costs and vendors' risk aversion reveal that multisourcing (single-sourcing) should be preferred when there are interdependence costs (/when vendors are strongly risk averse).

KW - Effort interdependence

KW - IT outsourcing

KW - Multisourcing

KW - Revenue verifiability

KW - Revenue-metric alignment

KW - Single-sourcing

KW - Task modularity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056001513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056001513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.25300/MISQ/2018/14067

DO - 10.25300/MISQ/2018/14067

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1171

EP - 1186

JO - MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

JF - MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

SN - 0276-7783

IS - 4

ER -