Silicon detector dark matter results from the final exposure of CDMS II

R. Agnese, Z. Ahmed, A. J. Anderson, S. Arrenberg, D. Balakishiyeva, R. Basu Thakur, D. A. Bauer, J. Billard, A. Borgland, D. Brandt, P. L. Brink, T. Bruch, R. Bunker, B. Cabrera, D. O. Caldwell, D. G. Cerdeno, H. Chagani, J. Cooley, B. Cornell, C. H. CrewdsonP. Cushman, M. Daal, F. Dejongh, E. Do Couto E Silva, T. Doughty, L. Esteban, S. Fallows, E. Figueroa-Feliciano, J. Filippini, J. Fox, M. Fritts, G. L. Godfrey, S. R. Golwala, J. Hall, R. H. Harris, S. A. Hertel, T. Hofer, D. Holmgren, L. Hsu, M. E. Huber, A. Jastram, O. Kamaev, B. Kara, M. H. Kelsey, A. Kennedy, P. Kim, M. Kiveni, K. Koch, M. Kos, S. W. Leman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

427 Scopus citations


We report results of a search for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPS) with the silicon detectors of the CDMS II experiment. This blind analysis of 140.2 kg day of data taken between July 2007 and September 2008 revealed three WIMP-candidate events with a surface-event background estimate of 0.41-0.08+0.20(stat)-0.24+0.28(syst). Other known backgrounds from neutrons and Pb206 are limited to <0.13 and <0.08 events at the 90% confidence level, respectively. The exposure of this analysis is equivalent to 23.4 kg day for a recoil energy range of 7-100 keV for a WIMP of mass 10 GeV/c2. The probability that the known backgrounds would produce three or more events in the signal region is 5.4%. A profile likelihood ratio test of the three events that includes the measured recoil energies gives a 0.19% probability for the known-background-only hypothesis when tested against the alternative WIMP+background hypothesis. The highest likelihood occurs for a WIMP mass of 8.6 GeV/c2 and WIMP-nucleon cross section of 1.9×10-41 cm2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number251301
JournalPhysical review letters
Issue number25
StatePublished - Dec 16 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Silicon detector dark matter results from the final exposure of CDMS II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this