Sibling Comparison Designs: Addressing Confounding Bias with Inclusion of Measured Confounders

Gretchen R.B. Saunders, Matt McGue, Stephen M. Malone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Genetically informative research designs are becoming increasingly popular as a way to strengthen causal inference with their ability to control for genetic and shared environmental confounding. Co-Twin control (CTC) models, a special case of these designs using twin samples, decompose the overall effect of exposure on outcome into a within-and between-Twin-pair term. Ideally, the within-Twin-pair term would serve as an estimate of the exposure effect controlling for genetic and shared environmental factors, but it is often confounded by factors not shared within a twin-pair. Previous simulation work has shown that if twins are less similar on an unmeasured confounder than they are on an exposure, the within-Twin-pair estimate will be a biased estimate of the exposure effect, even more biased than the individual, unpaired estimate. The current study uses simulation and analytical derivations to show that while incorporating a covariate related to the nonshared confounder in CTC models always reduces bias in the within-pair estimate, it will be less biased than the individual estimate only in a narrow set of circumstances. The best case for bias reduction in the within-pair estimate occurs when the within-Twin-pair correlation in exposure is less than the correlation in the confounder and the twin-pair correlation in the covariate is high. Additionally, the form of covariate inclusion is compared between adjustment for only one's own covariate value and adjustment for the deviation of one's own value from the covariate twin-pair mean. Results show that adjusting for the deviation from the twin-pair mean results in equal or reduced bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTwin Research and Human Genetics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Research Design

Keywords

  • Co-Twin control
  • between-within
  • bias
  • confounding
  • covariate adjustment
  • discordant twin

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Cite this

@article{5495639b0a8b47e4bf845fdc24a7ddd8,
title = "Sibling Comparison Designs: Addressing Confounding Bias with Inclusion of Measured Confounders",
abstract = "Genetically informative research designs are becoming increasingly popular as a way to strengthen causal inference with their ability to control for genetic and shared environmental confounding. Co-Twin control (CTC) models, a special case of these designs using twin samples, decompose the overall effect of exposure on outcome into a within-and between-Twin-pair term. Ideally, the within-Twin-pair term would serve as an estimate of the exposure effect controlling for genetic and shared environmental factors, but it is often confounded by factors not shared within a twin-pair. Previous simulation work has shown that if twins are less similar on an unmeasured confounder than they are on an exposure, the within-Twin-pair estimate will be a biased estimate of the exposure effect, even more biased than the individual, unpaired estimate. The current study uses simulation and analytical derivations to show that while incorporating a covariate related to the nonshared confounder in CTC models always reduces bias in the within-pair estimate, it will be less biased than the individual estimate only in a narrow set of circumstances. The best case for bias reduction in the within-pair estimate occurs when the within-Twin-pair correlation in exposure is less than the correlation in the confounder and the twin-pair correlation in the covariate is high. Additionally, the form of covariate inclusion is compared between adjustment for only one's own covariate value and adjustment for the deviation of one's own value from the covariate twin-pair mean. Results show that adjusting for the deviation from the twin-pair mean results in equal or reduced bias.",
keywords = "Co-Twin control, between-within, bias, confounding, covariate adjustment, discordant twin",
author = "Saunders, {Gretchen R.B.} and Matt McGue and Malone, {Stephen M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/thg.2019.67",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Twin Research and Human Genetics",
issn = "1832-4274",
publisher = "Australian Academic Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sibling Comparison Designs

T2 - Addressing Confounding Bias with Inclusion of Measured Confounders

AU - Saunders, Gretchen R.B.

AU - McGue, Matt

AU - Malone, Stephen M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Genetically informative research designs are becoming increasingly popular as a way to strengthen causal inference with their ability to control for genetic and shared environmental confounding. Co-Twin control (CTC) models, a special case of these designs using twin samples, decompose the overall effect of exposure on outcome into a within-and between-Twin-pair term. Ideally, the within-Twin-pair term would serve as an estimate of the exposure effect controlling for genetic and shared environmental factors, but it is often confounded by factors not shared within a twin-pair. Previous simulation work has shown that if twins are less similar on an unmeasured confounder than they are on an exposure, the within-Twin-pair estimate will be a biased estimate of the exposure effect, even more biased than the individual, unpaired estimate. The current study uses simulation and analytical derivations to show that while incorporating a covariate related to the nonshared confounder in CTC models always reduces bias in the within-pair estimate, it will be less biased than the individual estimate only in a narrow set of circumstances. The best case for bias reduction in the within-pair estimate occurs when the within-Twin-pair correlation in exposure is less than the correlation in the confounder and the twin-pair correlation in the covariate is high. Additionally, the form of covariate inclusion is compared between adjustment for only one's own covariate value and adjustment for the deviation of one's own value from the covariate twin-pair mean. Results show that adjusting for the deviation from the twin-pair mean results in equal or reduced bias.

AB - Genetically informative research designs are becoming increasingly popular as a way to strengthen causal inference with their ability to control for genetic and shared environmental confounding. Co-Twin control (CTC) models, a special case of these designs using twin samples, decompose the overall effect of exposure on outcome into a within-and between-Twin-pair term. Ideally, the within-Twin-pair term would serve as an estimate of the exposure effect controlling for genetic and shared environmental factors, but it is often confounded by factors not shared within a twin-pair. Previous simulation work has shown that if twins are less similar on an unmeasured confounder than they are on an exposure, the within-Twin-pair estimate will be a biased estimate of the exposure effect, even more biased than the individual, unpaired estimate. The current study uses simulation and analytical derivations to show that while incorporating a covariate related to the nonshared confounder in CTC models always reduces bias in the within-pair estimate, it will be less biased than the individual estimate only in a narrow set of circumstances. The best case for bias reduction in the within-pair estimate occurs when the within-Twin-pair correlation in exposure is less than the correlation in the confounder and the twin-pair correlation in the covariate is high. Additionally, the form of covariate inclusion is compared between adjustment for only one's own covariate value and adjustment for the deviation of one's own value from the covariate twin-pair mean. Results show that adjusting for the deviation from the twin-pair mean results in equal or reduced bias.

KW - Co-Twin control

KW - between-within

KW - bias

KW - confounding

KW - covariate adjustment

KW - discordant twin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072778347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072778347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/thg.2019.67

DO - 10.1017/thg.2019.67

M3 - Article

C2 - 31559947

AN - SCOPUS:85072778347

JO - Twin Research and Human Genetics

JF - Twin Research and Human Genetics

SN - 1832-4274

ER -