TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency
T2 - Estimating standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals
AU - Christ, Theodore J.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is an established procedure used to index the level and trend of student growth. A substantial literature base exists regarding best practices in the administration and interpretation of CBM-R; however, research has yet to adequately address the potential influence of measurement error. This study extends results of Hintze and Christ (2004) by incorporating research-based estimates of the standard error of the estimate (SEE) to generate likely magnitudes for the standard error of the slope (SEb) across a variety of progress monitoring durations and measurement conditions. Fourteen progress monitoring durations (2-15 weeks) and nine levels of SEE (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18) were used to derive SEb. The outcomes are discussed in relation to assessment practices, such as selecting optimal progress monitoring durations to reduce measurement error. Implications and limitations are discussed.
AB - Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is an established procedure used to index the level and trend of student growth. A substantial literature base exists regarding best practices in the administration and interpretation of CBM-R; however, research has yet to adequately address the potential influence of measurement error. This study extends results of Hintze and Christ (2004) by incorporating research-based estimates of the standard error of the estimate (SEE) to generate likely magnitudes for the standard error of the slope (SEb) across a variety of progress monitoring durations and measurement conditions. Fourteen progress monitoring durations (2-15 weeks) and nine levels of SEE (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18) were used to derive SEb. The outcomes are discussed in relation to assessment practices, such as selecting optimal progress monitoring durations to reduce measurement error. Implications and limitations are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646718778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646718778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02796015.2006.12088006
DO - 10.1080/02796015.2006.12088006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33646718778
SN - 0279-6015
VL - 35
SP - 128
EP - 133
JO - School Psychology Review
JF - School Psychology Review
IS - 1
ER -