Short- or Long-Term Treatment of Spinal Disability in Older Adults With Manipulation and Exercise

Michele Maiers, Jan Hartvigsen, Roni Evans, Kristine Westrom, Qi Wang, Craig Schulz, Brent Leininger, Gert Bronfort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Back and neck pain are associated with disability and loss of independence in older adults. Whether long-term management using commonly recommended treatments is superior to shorter-term treatment is unknown. This randomized clinical trial compared short-term treatment (12 weeks) versus long-term management (36 weeks) of back- and neck-related disability in older adults using spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) combined with supervised rehabilitative exercises (SRE). Methods: Eligible participants were ages ≥65 years with back and neck disability for ≥12 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores after 36 weeks. An intent-to-treat approach used linear mixed-model analysis to detect between-group differences. Secondary analyses included other self-reported outcomes, adverse events, and objective functional measures. Results: A total of 182 participants were randomized. The short-term and long-term groups demonstrated significant improvements in back disability (ODI score –3.9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) –5.8, –2.0] versus ODI score –6.3 [95% CI –8.2, –4.4]) and neck disability (NDI score –7.3 [95% CI –9.1, –5.5] versus NDI score –9.0 [95% CI –10.8, –7.2]) after 36 weeks, with no difference between groups (back ODI score 2.4 [95% CI –0.3, 5.1]; neck NDI score 1.7 [95% CI 0.8, 4.2]). The long-term management group experienced greater improvement in neck pain at week 36, in self-efficacy at weeks 36 and 52, and in functional ability, and balance. Conclusion: For older adults with chronic back and neck disability, extending management with SMT and SRE from 12 to 36 weeks did not result in any additional important reduction in disability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1516-1524
Number of pages9
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume71
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Neck
Confidence Intervals
Musculoskeletal Manipulations
Neck Pain
Therapeutics
Aptitude
Self Efficacy
Back Pain
Linear Models
Randomized Controlled Trials

Cite this

Short- or Long-Term Treatment of Spinal Disability in Older Adults With Manipulation and Exercise. / Maiers, Michele; Hartvigsen, Jan; Evans, Roni; Westrom, Kristine; Wang, Qi; Schulz, Craig; Leininger, Brent; Bronfort, Gert.

In: Arthritis Care and Research, Vol. 71, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 1516-1524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9fe935527e64aa5acd0f45ca1de7af3,
title = "Short- or Long-Term Treatment of Spinal Disability in Older Adults With Manipulation and Exercise",
abstract = "Objective: Back and neck pain are associated with disability and loss of independence in older adults. Whether long-term management using commonly recommended treatments is superior to shorter-term treatment is unknown. This randomized clinical trial compared short-term treatment (12 weeks) versus long-term management (36 weeks) of back- and neck-related disability in older adults using spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) combined with supervised rehabilitative exercises (SRE). Methods: Eligible participants were ages ≥65 years with back and neck disability for ≥12 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores after 36 weeks. An intent-to-treat approach used linear mixed-model analysis to detect between-group differences. Secondary analyses included other self-reported outcomes, adverse events, and objective functional measures. Results: A total of 182 participants were randomized. The short-term and long-term groups demonstrated significant improvements in back disability (ODI score –3.9 [95{\%} confidence interval (95{\%} CI) –5.8, –2.0] versus ODI score –6.3 [95{\%} CI –8.2, –4.4]) and neck disability (NDI score –7.3 [95{\%} CI –9.1, –5.5] versus NDI score –9.0 [95{\%} CI –10.8, –7.2]) after 36 weeks, with no difference between groups (back ODI score 2.4 [95{\%} CI –0.3, 5.1]; neck NDI score 1.7 [95{\%} CI 0.8, 4.2]). The long-term management group experienced greater improvement in neck pain at week 36, in self-efficacy at weeks 36 and 52, and in functional ability, and balance. Conclusion: For older adults with chronic back and neck disability, extending management with SMT and SRE from 12 to 36 weeks did not result in any additional important reduction in disability.",
author = "Michele Maiers and Jan Hartvigsen and Roni Evans and Kristine Westrom and Qi Wang and Craig Schulz and Brent Leininger and Gert Bronfort",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acr.23798",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "1516--1524",
journal = "Arthritis Care and Research",
issn = "2151-464X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short- or Long-Term Treatment of Spinal Disability in Older Adults With Manipulation and Exercise

AU - Maiers, Michele

AU - Hartvigsen, Jan

AU - Evans, Roni

AU - Westrom, Kristine

AU - Wang, Qi

AU - Schulz, Craig

AU - Leininger, Brent

AU - Bronfort, Gert

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Objective: Back and neck pain are associated with disability and loss of independence in older adults. Whether long-term management using commonly recommended treatments is superior to shorter-term treatment is unknown. This randomized clinical trial compared short-term treatment (12 weeks) versus long-term management (36 weeks) of back- and neck-related disability in older adults using spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) combined with supervised rehabilitative exercises (SRE). Methods: Eligible participants were ages ≥65 years with back and neck disability for ≥12 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores after 36 weeks. An intent-to-treat approach used linear mixed-model analysis to detect between-group differences. Secondary analyses included other self-reported outcomes, adverse events, and objective functional measures. Results: A total of 182 participants were randomized. The short-term and long-term groups demonstrated significant improvements in back disability (ODI score –3.9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) –5.8, –2.0] versus ODI score –6.3 [95% CI –8.2, –4.4]) and neck disability (NDI score –7.3 [95% CI –9.1, –5.5] versus NDI score –9.0 [95% CI –10.8, –7.2]) after 36 weeks, with no difference between groups (back ODI score 2.4 [95% CI –0.3, 5.1]; neck NDI score 1.7 [95% CI 0.8, 4.2]). The long-term management group experienced greater improvement in neck pain at week 36, in self-efficacy at weeks 36 and 52, and in functional ability, and balance. Conclusion: For older adults with chronic back and neck disability, extending management with SMT and SRE from 12 to 36 weeks did not result in any additional important reduction in disability.

AB - Objective: Back and neck pain are associated with disability and loss of independence in older adults. Whether long-term management using commonly recommended treatments is superior to shorter-term treatment is unknown. This randomized clinical trial compared short-term treatment (12 weeks) versus long-term management (36 weeks) of back- and neck-related disability in older adults using spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) combined with supervised rehabilitative exercises (SRE). Methods: Eligible participants were ages ≥65 years with back and neck disability for ≥12 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores after 36 weeks. An intent-to-treat approach used linear mixed-model analysis to detect between-group differences. Secondary analyses included other self-reported outcomes, adverse events, and objective functional measures. Results: A total of 182 participants were randomized. The short-term and long-term groups demonstrated significant improvements in back disability (ODI score –3.9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) –5.8, –2.0] versus ODI score –6.3 [95% CI –8.2, –4.4]) and neck disability (NDI score –7.3 [95% CI –9.1, –5.5] versus NDI score –9.0 [95% CI –10.8, –7.2]) after 36 weeks, with no difference between groups (back ODI score 2.4 [95% CI –0.3, 5.1]; neck NDI score 1.7 [95% CI 0.8, 4.2]). The long-term management group experienced greater improvement in neck pain at week 36, in self-efficacy at weeks 36 and 52, and in functional ability, and balance. Conclusion: For older adults with chronic back and neck disability, extending management with SMT and SRE from 12 to 36 weeks did not result in any additional important reduction in disability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074215905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074215905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acr.23798

DO - 10.1002/acr.23798

M3 - Article

C2 - 30354023

AN - SCOPUS:85074215905

VL - 71

SP - 1516

EP - 1524

JO - Arthritis Care and Research

JF - Arthritis Care and Research

SN - 2151-464X

IS - 11

ER -