Abstract
Benefit-cost analysis was conducted to estimate the increase in earnings, increased tax revenues, value of less crime, and reductions in welfare costs attributable to nationwide implementation of rapid assessment, a promising intervention for raising student achievement in math and reading. Results suggest that social benefits would exceed total social costs by a ratio of 28. Fiscal benefits to the federal government would exceed costs to the federal treasury by a ratio of 93. Social benefits would exceed costs to each state treasury by a ratio no lower than 286, and fiscal benefits would exceed costs to each state treasury by a ratio no lower than 5, for all but two state treasuries. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the findings are robust to a 5-fold change in the underlying parameters.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 74-82 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Evaluation and Program Planning |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Economics of education
- Educational finance
- Educational productivity
- Evaluation
- Mathematics
- Reading
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Shifting the bell curve: The benefits and costs of raising student achievement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS