Abstract
The 'shared knowledge' often associated with specific linguistic forms, such as definite descriptions, cleft constructions and specific intonation contours is shown to be a function of the role of these constructions in encoding the topic-comment structure of a sentence. It is argued that this explains certain properties of the relation between shared knowledge and linguistic form, in particular: (1) why 'shared knowledge' is associated with some forms and not with others; (2) why 'shared knowledge' is not consistently associated even with these forms; and (3) why what is assumed to be 'shared' is familiarity with a discourse entity and not necessarily belief in the truth of a corresponding proposition.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 83-107 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1985 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Shared knowledge' and topicality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS