Abstract
Fines and fees charged to lower-income people, mostly African Americans, have long been a mainstay of the revenue stream for the city of Ferguson, Missouri, and other local governments. One outcome of this practice is financial dependency that limits the life-choices of the affected population. This current policy issue shares characteristics with the much older technique of sharecropping, suggesting a long-term pattern of financial exploitation based on race. The authors use a critical race theory framework to examine the question of administrative ethics raised by this practice.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-126 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Public Integrity |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016, Copyright © American Society for Public Administration.
Keywords
- African American
- critical race theory
- ethics
- Ferguson
- justice system
- sharecropping