TY - JOUR
T1 - SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions
T2 - A thought experiment
AU - Polly, David W.
AU - Glassman, Steven D.
AU - Schwender, James D.
AU - Shaffrey, Christopher I.
AU - Branch, Charles
AU - Burkus, J. Kenneth
AU - Gornet, Matthew F.
AU - Abitbol, J. J.
AU - Berven, Sig
AU - Bono, Chris
AU - Fessler, Rick
AU - Foley, Kevin
AU - Frey, George
AU - Girasole, Girard
AU - Goldstein, Jeff
AU - Heim, Steve
AU - LeHuec, Jean Charles
AU - Mathews, Hal
AU - Nockels, Russ
AU - Peloza, John
AU - Rosner, Michael
AU - Rauschning, Wolfgang
AU - Sasso, Rick
AU - Schuler, Thomas
AU - Slosar, Paul
AU - Subach, Brian
AU - Thomas, Najeeb
AU - Zdeblick, Tom
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - STUDY DESIGN. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES. To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in other surgical interventions (total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery) to define the average reimbursement costs per PCS improvement with each of these interventions. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA. Data from 11 prospective multicenter studies (9 Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption, Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials, class 1 data) accounted for the lumbar spine fusion group (n = 1826). Data for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery were obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature. METHODS. Comparisons of SF-36 PCS improvements were made at defined postoperative time points and with published study findings of other medical conditions. Reimbursement estimates (not including estimated physician and rehabilitation fees) for each surgical intervention were based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data (2002). Cost estimates were calculated for a minimal clinical important improvement (reimbursement dollars/mean PCS change *5.42 point PCS improvement). RESULTS. SF-36 PCS significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years following lumbar spine fusion surgery (P < 0.0001), and was comparable to the control surgical outcomes. With the use of data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data, hospital reimbursement averaged $15.2-18.2K for lumbar spine fusion, $9.8-11.3K for total knee replacement, $9.6-11.3K for total hip replacement, and $9.8-11.3K for coronary artery bypass surgery. Calculations of reimbursement dollars to elicit minimum clinically important change in PCS of 5.42 points following surgery ranged from $6.1 to $7.3K for lumbar spine fusion, $5.7 to $6.6K for total knee arthroplasty, $3.9 to $4.5K for total hip replacement, and $18.2 to $22.5K for coronary artery bypass surgery. CONCLUSION. While the exact numbers may vary for each treatment based on the population studied and the cost estimates used, lumbar fusion cost per benefit achieved was very comparable to other well-accepted medical interventions (total hip replacement, total knee replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery).
AB - STUDY DESIGN. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES. To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in other surgical interventions (total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery) to define the average reimbursement costs per PCS improvement with each of these interventions. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA. Data from 11 prospective multicenter studies (9 Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption, Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials, class 1 data) accounted for the lumbar spine fusion group (n = 1826). Data for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery were obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature. METHODS. Comparisons of SF-36 PCS improvements were made at defined postoperative time points and with published study findings of other medical conditions. Reimbursement estimates (not including estimated physician and rehabilitation fees) for each surgical intervention were based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data (2002). Cost estimates were calculated for a minimal clinical important improvement (reimbursement dollars/mean PCS change *5.42 point PCS improvement). RESULTS. SF-36 PCS significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years following lumbar spine fusion surgery (P < 0.0001), and was comparable to the control surgical outcomes. With the use of data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data, hospital reimbursement averaged $15.2-18.2K for lumbar spine fusion, $9.8-11.3K for total knee replacement, $9.6-11.3K for total hip replacement, and $9.8-11.3K for coronary artery bypass surgery. Calculations of reimbursement dollars to elicit minimum clinically important change in PCS of 5.42 points following surgery ranged from $6.1 to $7.3K for lumbar spine fusion, $5.7 to $6.6K for total knee arthroplasty, $3.9 to $4.5K for total hip replacement, and $18.2 to $22.5K for coronary artery bypass surgery. CONCLUSION. While the exact numbers may vary for each treatment based on the population studied and the cost estimates used, lumbar fusion cost per benefit achieved was very comparable to other well-accepted medical interventions (total hip replacement, total knee replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery).
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Fusion
KW - SF-36
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248362314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248362314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4e5
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4e5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17495582
AN - SCOPUS:34248362314
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 32
SP - S20-S26
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 11 SUPPL.
ER -