Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Power is at the core of feminist theories of sexual harassment, although it has rarely been measured directly in terms of workplace authority. Popular characterizations portray male supervisors harassing female subordinates, but power-threat theories suggest that women in authority may be more frequent targets. This article analyzes longitudinal survey data and qualitative interviews from the Youth Development Study to test this idea and to delineate why and how supervisory authority, gender nonconformity, and workplace sex ratios affect harassment. Relative to nonsupervisors, female supervisors are more likely to report harassing behaviors and to define their experiences as sexual harassment. Sexual harassment can serve as an equalizer against women in power, motivated more by control and domination than by sexual desire. Interviews point to social isolation as a mechanism linking harassment to gender nonconformity and women's authority, particularly in male-dominated work settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-647
Number of pages23
JournalAmerican Sociological Review
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • gender
  • inequality
  • power
  • sexual harassment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this