Seven reasons why binary diagnostic categories should be replaced with empirically sounder and less stigmatizing dimensions

Benjamin B. Lahey, Henning Tiemeier, Robert F. Krueger

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: An ongoing positive revolution advocates a new approach to the individual differences in human emotions, cognitions, and behavior that cause distress and impair functioning. This revolution endorses the long-proposed, but still unrealized rejection of the medical model, which attributes psychological problems to a sick brain or mind. In addition, it advocates replacing the binary diagnoses used in ICD and DSM, which assume a clear discontinuity between “normal” and “abnormal” functioning, with continuous dimensions of psychological problems. Method: Selective literature review. Results and Discussion: Seven strong reasons are provided for adopting a dimensional approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12108
JournalJCPP Advances
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. JCPP Advances published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

Keywords

  • dimensional approach
  • stigma
  • taxonomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Seven reasons why binary diagnostic categories should be replaced with empirically sounder and less stigmatizing dimensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this