Seven but not 5-month-old infants extract depth from cast shadows

Albert Yonas, M. Farr, A. O'Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The first description of a depth cue, the proximal information for the location of an object in space, was probably Leonardo da Vinci's advice to painters on how to create the impression that an object is some distance from a background by using cast shadows. This study presents the first evidence that human infants can use this information to control spatial behavior. Purpose: To investigate the infant's sensitivity to the location of a cast shadow as a cue for depth. Method: Preferential reaching to the apparently closer of two toys that were presented using computer generated display was used to gauge the perception of depth. The "near" and "far" toys were actually equally distant from the infant, while an illusion of a depth difference was generated by differences in the location of cast shadows. The left right positions of the toys were randomized over trials. Two conditions were used in this study. An experimental condition in which the infant has one eye covered to remove binocular information for depth and a control condition in which displays were viewed with two eyes to observe whether preferential reaching was reduced. Six reaches in both conditions were required for the results of an infant to be included in the study. The performance of infants with an average age of 30 weeks was compared with that of 21-week-old infants under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. Results: The older infants show a significantly higher tendency to reach toward the toy in the apparently closer display, with an extended cast-shadow, when they viewed it with one eye rather than two. In contrast, the younger (5-month-old) infants did not. Conclusion: The failure to find responsiveness to cast shadow information in 5-month olds argues against the hypothesis that different pictorial depth cues develop at different times. It implies that a single mechanism may underlie the development of all pictorial cues and perhaps other static-monocular information for the environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001

Fingerprint

Play and Playthings
Cues
Spatial Behavior
Depth Perception

Cite this

Seven but not 5-month-old infants extract depth from cast shadows. / Yonas, Albert; Farr, M.; O'Connor, A.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 1, No. 3, 01.12.2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff0fffaaef7e41f18c0a453d67de3d26,
title = "Seven but not 5-month-old infants extract depth from cast shadows",
abstract = "Introduction: The first description of a depth cue, the proximal information for the location of an object in space, was probably Leonardo da Vinci's advice to painters on how to create the impression that an object is some distance from a background by using cast shadows. This study presents the first evidence that human infants can use this information to control spatial behavior. Purpose: To investigate the infant's sensitivity to the location of a cast shadow as a cue for depth. Method: Preferential reaching to the apparently closer of two toys that were presented using computer generated display was used to gauge the perception of depth. The {"}near{"} and {"}far{"} toys were actually equally distant from the infant, while an illusion of a depth difference was generated by differences in the location of cast shadows. The left right positions of the toys were randomized over trials. Two conditions were used in this study. An experimental condition in which the infant has one eye covered to remove binocular information for depth and a control condition in which displays were viewed with two eyes to observe whether preferential reaching was reduced. Six reaches in both conditions were required for the results of an infant to be included in the study. The performance of infants with an average age of 30 weeks was compared with that of 21-week-old infants under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. Results: The older infants show a significantly higher tendency to reach toward the toy in the apparently closer display, with an extended cast-shadow, when they viewed it with one eye rather than two. In contrast, the younger (5-month-old) infants did not. Conclusion: The failure to find responsiveness to cast shadow information in 5-month olds argues against the hypothesis that different pictorial depth cues develop at different times. It implies that a single mechanism may underlie the development of all pictorial cues and perhaps other static-monocular information for the environment.",
author = "Albert Yonas and M. Farr and A. O'Connor",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/1.3.389",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seven but not 5-month-old infants extract depth from cast shadows

AU - Yonas, Albert

AU - Farr, M.

AU - O'Connor, A.

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Introduction: The first description of a depth cue, the proximal information for the location of an object in space, was probably Leonardo da Vinci's advice to painters on how to create the impression that an object is some distance from a background by using cast shadows. This study presents the first evidence that human infants can use this information to control spatial behavior. Purpose: To investigate the infant's sensitivity to the location of a cast shadow as a cue for depth. Method: Preferential reaching to the apparently closer of two toys that were presented using computer generated display was used to gauge the perception of depth. The "near" and "far" toys were actually equally distant from the infant, while an illusion of a depth difference was generated by differences in the location of cast shadows. The left right positions of the toys were randomized over trials. Two conditions were used in this study. An experimental condition in which the infant has one eye covered to remove binocular information for depth and a control condition in which displays were viewed with two eyes to observe whether preferential reaching was reduced. Six reaches in both conditions were required for the results of an infant to be included in the study. The performance of infants with an average age of 30 weeks was compared with that of 21-week-old infants under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. Results: The older infants show a significantly higher tendency to reach toward the toy in the apparently closer display, with an extended cast-shadow, when they viewed it with one eye rather than two. In contrast, the younger (5-month-old) infants did not. Conclusion: The failure to find responsiveness to cast shadow information in 5-month olds argues against the hypothesis that different pictorial depth cues develop at different times. It implies that a single mechanism may underlie the development of all pictorial cues and perhaps other static-monocular information for the environment.

AB - Introduction: The first description of a depth cue, the proximal information for the location of an object in space, was probably Leonardo da Vinci's advice to painters on how to create the impression that an object is some distance from a background by using cast shadows. This study presents the first evidence that human infants can use this information to control spatial behavior. Purpose: To investigate the infant's sensitivity to the location of a cast shadow as a cue for depth. Method: Preferential reaching to the apparently closer of two toys that were presented using computer generated display was used to gauge the perception of depth. The "near" and "far" toys were actually equally distant from the infant, while an illusion of a depth difference was generated by differences in the location of cast shadows. The left right positions of the toys were randomized over trials. Two conditions were used in this study. An experimental condition in which the infant has one eye covered to remove binocular information for depth and a control condition in which displays were viewed with two eyes to observe whether preferential reaching was reduced. Six reaches in both conditions were required for the results of an infant to be included in the study. The performance of infants with an average age of 30 weeks was compared with that of 21-week-old infants under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. Results: The older infants show a significantly higher tendency to reach toward the toy in the apparently closer display, with an extended cast-shadow, when they viewed it with one eye rather than two. In contrast, the younger (5-month-old) infants did not. Conclusion: The failure to find responsiveness to cast shadow information in 5-month olds argues against the hypothesis that different pictorial depth cues develop at different times. It implies that a single mechanism may underlie the development of all pictorial cues and perhaps other static-monocular information for the environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143083916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143083916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/1.3.389

DO - 10.1167/1.3.389

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 3

ER -