Semi-automated approaches to optimize deep brain stimulation parameters in Parkinson’s disease

Kenneth H. Louie, Matthew N. Petrucci, Logan L. Grado, Chiahao Lu, Paul J. Tuite, Andrew G. Lamperski, Colum D. MacKinnon, Scott E. Cooper, Theoden I. Netoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment option for Parkinson’s disease patients when medication does not sufficiently manage their symptoms. DBS can be a highly effect therapy, but only after a time-consuming trial-and-error stimulation parameter adjustment process that is susceptible to clinician bias. This trial-and-error process will be further prolonged with the introduction of segmented electrodes that are now commercially available. New approaches to optimizing a patient’s stimulation parameters, that can also handle the increasing complexity of new electrode and stimulator designs, is needed. Methods: To improve DBS parameter programming, we explored two semi-automated optimization approaches: a Bayesian optimization (BayesOpt) algorithm to efficiently determine a patient’s optimal stimulation parameter for minimizing rigidity, and a probit Gaussian process (pGP) to assess patient’s preference. Quantified rigidity measurements were obtained using a robotic manipulandum in two participants over two visits. Rigidity was measured, in 5Hz increments, between 10–185Hz (total 30–36 frequencies) on the first visit and at eight BayesOpt algorithm-selected frequencies on the second visit. The participant was also asked their preference between the current and previous stimulation frequency. First, we compared the optimal frequency between visits with the participant’s preferred frequency. Next, we evaluated the efficiency of the BayesOpt algorithm, comparing it to random and equal interval selection of frequency. Results: The BayesOpt algorithm estimated the optimal frequency to be the highest tolerable frequency, matching the optimal frequency found during the first visit. However, the participants’ pGP models indicate a preference at frequencies between 70–110 Hz. Here the stimulation frequency is lowest that achieves nearly maximal suppression of rigidity. BayesOpt was efficient, estimating the rigidity response curve to stimulation that was almost indistinguishable when compared to the longer brute force method. Conclusions: These results provide preliminary evidence of the feasibility to use BayesOpt for determining the optimal frequency, while pGP patient’s preferences include more difficult to measure outcomes. Both novel approaches can shorten DBS programming and can be expanded to include multiple symptoms and parameters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number83
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by Parkinson Study Group and the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation’s Advancing Parkinson’ Treatments Innovations Grant, the MnDRIVE Brain Conditions Fellowship, NIH Grant P50-NS098573, CTSI award 26431, and T32-MH115886.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Bayesian optimization
  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Gaussian process
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Probit
  • Rigidity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Semi-automated approaches to optimize deep brain stimulation parameters in Parkinson’s disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this