Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal

Steven W. Gangestad, Mark Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

402 Scopus citations

Abstract

Theory and research on self-monitoring have accumulated into a sizable literature on the impact of variation in the extent to which people cultivate public appearances in diverse domains of social functioning. Yet self-monitoring and its measure, the Self-Monitoring Scale, are surrounded by controversy generated by conflicting answers to the critical question, Is self-monitoring a unitary phenomenon? A primary source of answers to this question has been largely neglected - the Self-Monitoring Scale's relations with external criteria. We propose a quantitative method to examine the self-monitoring literature and thereby address major issues of the controversy. Application of this method reveals that, with important exceptions, a wide range of external criteria tap a dimension directly measured by the Self-Monitoring Scale. We discuss what this appraisal reveals about what self-monitoring is and is not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)530-555
Number of pages26
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume126
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2000

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this