TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-Monitoring and the Metatraits
AU - Wilmot, Michael P.
AU - DeYoung, Colin G
AU - Stillwell, David
AU - Kosinski, Michal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Prior attempts at locating self-monitoring within general taxonomies of personality traits have largely proved unsuccessful. However, past research has typically neglected (a) the bidimensionality of the Self-Monitoring Scale and (b) the hierarchical nature of personality. The objective of this study was to test hypotheses that the two self-monitoring factors are located at the level of the metatraits. Using data from two large multi-informant samples, one community (Sample 1: N=552, Mage=51.26, 61% female; NPeers=1,551, Mage=48.61, 37% female) and one online (Sample 2: N=3,726, Mage=24.89, 59% female; NPeers=17,868, Mage=26.23, 64% female), confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the hypotheses. Results confirmed hypotheses that acquisitive self-monitoring would have a strong positive relation to metatrait Plasticity, whereas protective self-monitoring would have a moderate negative relation to metatrait Stability. In both samples, constraining the correlation between acquisitive self-monitoring and Plasticity to unity did not alter model fit indices, indicating that the two putatively distinct constructs are identical. Findings have wide-ranging implications, including integration of the construct of self-monitoring into the mainstream of personality research, as the latter moves toward the development of broad explanatory theories.
AB - Prior attempts at locating self-monitoring within general taxonomies of personality traits have largely proved unsuccessful. However, past research has typically neglected (a) the bidimensionality of the Self-Monitoring Scale and (b) the hierarchical nature of personality. The objective of this study was to test hypotheses that the two self-monitoring factors are located at the level of the metatraits. Using data from two large multi-informant samples, one community (Sample 1: N=552, Mage=51.26, 61% female; NPeers=1,551, Mage=48.61, 37% female) and one online (Sample 2: N=3,726, Mage=24.89, 59% female; NPeers=17,868, Mage=26.23, 64% female), confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the hypotheses. Results confirmed hypotheses that acquisitive self-monitoring would have a strong positive relation to metatrait Plasticity, whereas protective self-monitoring would have a moderate negative relation to metatrait Stability. In both samples, constraining the correlation between acquisitive self-monitoring and Plasticity to unity did not alter model fit indices, indicating that the two putatively distinct constructs are identical. Findings have wide-ranging implications, including integration of the construct of self-monitoring into the mainstream of personality research, as the latter moves toward the development of broad explanatory theories.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923238463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923238463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jopy.12162
DO - 10.1111/jopy.12162
M3 - Article
C2 - 25565551
AN - SCOPUS:84923238463
SN - 0022-3506
VL - 84
SP - 335
EP - 347
JO - Journal of personality
JF - Journal of personality
IS - 3
ER -