TY - JOUR
T1 - Secular trends in colon and rectal cancer relative survival
AU - Rutter, Carolyn M.
AU - Johnson, Eric A.
AU - Feuer, Eric J.
AU - Knudsen, Amy B.
AU - Kuntz, Karen M.
AU - Schrag, Deborah
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award No. U01CA52959.
PY - 2013/12/4
Y1 - 2013/12/4
N2 - Background Treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC) have improved substantially over the past 25 years. Measuring the impact of these improvements on survival outcomes is challenging, however, against the background of overall survival gains from advancements in the prevention, screening, and treatment of other conditions. Relative survival is a metric that accounts for these concurrent changes, allowing assessment of changes in CRC survival. We describe stage- and location-specific trends in relative survival after CRC diagnosis. Methods We analyzed survival outcomes for 233 965 people in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program who were diagnosed with CRC between January 1, 1975, and December 31, 2003. All models were adjusted for sex, race (black vs white), age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, and diagnosis year. We estimated the proportional difference in survival for CRC patients compared with overall survival for age-, sex-, race-, and period-matched controls to account for concurrent changes in overall survival using two-sided Wald tests. Results We found statistically significant reductions in excess hazard of mortality from CRC in 2003 relative to 1975, with excess hazard ratios ranging from 0.75 (stage IV colon cancer; P < .001) to 0.32 (stage I rectal cancer; P < .001), indicating improvements in relative survival for all stages and cancer locations. These improvements occurred in earlier years for patients diagnosed with stage I cancers, with smaller but continuing improvements for laterstage cancers. Conclusions Our results demonstrate a steady trend toward improved relative survival for CRC, indicating that treatment and surveillance improvements have had an impact at the population level.
AB - Background Treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC) have improved substantially over the past 25 years. Measuring the impact of these improvements on survival outcomes is challenging, however, against the background of overall survival gains from advancements in the prevention, screening, and treatment of other conditions. Relative survival is a metric that accounts for these concurrent changes, allowing assessment of changes in CRC survival. We describe stage- and location-specific trends in relative survival after CRC diagnosis. Methods We analyzed survival outcomes for 233 965 people in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program who were diagnosed with CRC between January 1, 1975, and December 31, 2003. All models were adjusted for sex, race (black vs white), age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, and diagnosis year. We estimated the proportional difference in survival for CRC patients compared with overall survival for age-, sex-, race-, and period-matched controls to account for concurrent changes in overall survival using two-sided Wald tests. Results We found statistically significant reductions in excess hazard of mortality from CRC in 2003 relative to 1975, with excess hazard ratios ranging from 0.75 (stage IV colon cancer; P < .001) to 0.32 (stage I rectal cancer; P < .001), indicating improvements in relative survival for all stages and cancer locations. These improvements occurred in earlier years for patients diagnosed with stage I cancers, with smaller but continuing improvements for laterstage cancers. Conclusions Our results demonstrate a steady trend toward improved relative survival for CRC, indicating that treatment and surveillance improvements have had an impact at the population level.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890520609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890520609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djt299
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djt299
M3 - Article
C2 - 24174654
AN - SCOPUS:84890520609
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 105
SP - 1806
EP - 1813
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 23
ER -