TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for renal cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients
T2 - A single-centre retrospective study
AU - Yohannan, Binoy
AU - Sridhar, Arthi
AU - Kaur, Harmanpreet
AU - Degolovine, Aleksandra
AU - Maithel, Neha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/9/12
Y1 - 2023/9/12
N2 - Objectives The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) screening in renal transplant (RT) recipients. Design Single-centre retrospective study. Setting and participants 1998 RT recipients who underwent RT at Memorial Hermann Hospital (MHH) Texas Medical Center (TMC) between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019 were included and we identified 16 patients (0.8%) with RCC. An additional four patients with RCC who underwent RT elsewhere but received follow-up at MHH TMC were also included. Subject races included white (20%), black (50%), Hispanic (20%) and Asian (10%). Outcome measures The RCC stage at diagnosis and outcomes were compared between patients who were screening versus those who were not. Results We identified a total of 20 patients with post-RT RCC, 75% of whom were men. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years. RCC histologies included clear cell (75%), papillary (20%) and chromophobe (5%). Patients with post-RT RCC who had screening (n=12) underwent ultrasound or CT annually or every 2 years, whereas eight patients had no screening. All 12 patients who had screening had early-stage disease at diagnosis (stage I (n=11) or stage II (n=1)) and were cured by nephrectomy (n=10) or cryotherapy (n=2). In patients who had no screening, three (37.5%) had stage IV RCC at diagnosis and all of whom died of metastatic disease. There was a statistically significant difference in RCC-specific survival in patients who were screened (p=0.01) compared with those who were not screened. Conclusion All RT recipients who had RCC diagnosed based on screening had early-stage disease and there were no RCC-related deaths. Screening is an effective intervention in RT recipients to reduce RCC-related mortality.
AB - Objectives The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) screening in renal transplant (RT) recipients. Design Single-centre retrospective study. Setting and participants 1998 RT recipients who underwent RT at Memorial Hermann Hospital (MHH) Texas Medical Center (TMC) between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019 were included and we identified 16 patients (0.8%) with RCC. An additional four patients with RCC who underwent RT elsewhere but received follow-up at MHH TMC were also included. Subject races included white (20%), black (50%), Hispanic (20%) and Asian (10%). Outcome measures The RCC stage at diagnosis and outcomes were compared between patients who were screening versus those who were not. Results We identified a total of 20 patients with post-RT RCC, 75% of whom were men. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years. RCC histologies included clear cell (75%), papillary (20%) and chromophobe (5%). Patients with post-RT RCC who had screening (n=12) underwent ultrasound or CT annually or every 2 years, whereas eight patients had no screening. All 12 patients who had screening had early-stage disease at diagnosis (stage I (n=11) or stage II (n=1)) and were cured by nephrectomy (n=10) or cryotherapy (n=2). In patients who had no screening, three (37.5%) had stage IV RCC at diagnosis and all of whom died of metastatic disease. There was a statistically significant difference in RCC-specific survival in patients who were screened (p=0.01) compared with those who were not screened. Conclusion All RT recipients who had RCC diagnosed based on screening had early-stage disease and there were no RCC-related deaths. Screening is an effective intervention in RT recipients to reduce RCC-related mortality.
KW - end stage renal failure
KW - kidney tumours
KW - renal transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171119485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171119485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071658
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071658
M3 - Article
C2 - 37699639
AN - SCOPUS:85171119485
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 13
JO - BMJ open
JF - BMJ open
IS - 9
M1 - e071658
ER -