TY - JOUR
T1 - Scapular kinematics variability in individuals with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain
T2 - A systematic review with multilevel meta-regression
AU - Fernández-Matías, Rubén
AU - Ballesteros-Frutos, Jorge
AU - Gallardo-Zamora, Pablo
AU - Requejo-Salinas, Néstor
AU - Caballero-Pozo, Iván
AU - Ludewig, Paula
AU - Lluch-Girbés, Enrique
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
PY - 2025/11/1
Y1 - 2025/11/1
N2 - Background: Traditionally, great importance has been placed on abnormal scapula kinematics in the approach to treatment of patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP). Objective: To review the literature regarding the variability of scapular position and movement in individuals with and without RCRSP. Methods: A systematic search was performed on 18th April 2024 on nine databases. Studies evaluating scapular kinematics during arm elevation in healthy individuals and those with RCRSP were included, with a focus on 3D non-surface tracking systems. Results: Twenty studies were included. In asymptomatic individuals, the estimated scapular position at rest was 1.00° to 11.58° of upward rotation (UR), 4.82° to 11.24° of anterior tilt, and 26.84° to 39.05° of internal rotation. During arm elevation, the scapula moves from the very beginning (no setting phase) towards UR (final position, 47.88° to 61.00° at 150° of elevation) and posterior tilt (final position, 10.78° to 11.96° at 150° of elevation), and there is a trend towards external rotation. The estimated scapulohumeral rhythm for humerothoracic elevation and scapular UR ranged from 2.86:1 to 3.13:1. There was very low certainty of evidence for differences in individuals with RCRSP in scapula resting position for UR (mean difference, -6.11° 95 % CI: -7.36°, -4.86°), and internal rotation (mean difference, 4.21° 95 % CI: 0.68°, 7.74°), that were below the width of the 95 % prediction intervals. Conclusion: This meta-analysis has debunked the myth of the setting phase and the constant 3:1 scapulohumeral rhythm. There is great variability in scapular kinematics, making it difficult to detect abnormal patterns.
AB - Background: Traditionally, great importance has been placed on abnormal scapula kinematics in the approach to treatment of patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP). Objective: To review the literature regarding the variability of scapular position and movement in individuals with and without RCRSP. Methods: A systematic search was performed on 18th April 2024 on nine databases. Studies evaluating scapular kinematics during arm elevation in healthy individuals and those with RCRSP were included, with a focus on 3D non-surface tracking systems. Results: Twenty studies were included. In asymptomatic individuals, the estimated scapular position at rest was 1.00° to 11.58° of upward rotation (UR), 4.82° to 11.24° of anterior tilt, and 26.84° to 39.05° of internal rotation. During arm elevation, the scapula moves from the very beginning (no setting phase) towards UR (final position, 47.88° to 61.00° at 150° of elevation) and posterior tilt (final position, 10.78° to 11.96° at 150° of elevation), and there is a trend towards external rotation. The estimated scapulohumeral rhythm for humerothoracic elevation and scapular UR ranged from 2.86:1 to 3.13:1. There was very low certainty of evidence for differences in individuals with RCRSP in scapula resting position for UR (mean difference, -6.11° 95 % CI: -7.36°, -4.86°), and internal rotation (mean difference, 4.21° 95 % CI: 0.68°, 7.74°), that were below the width of the 95 % prediction intervals. Conclusion: This meta-analysis has debunked the myth of the setting phase and the constant 3:1 scapulohumeral rhythm. There is great variability in scapular kinematics, making it difficult to detect abnormal patterns.
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Physical therapy
KW - Scapular dyskinesis
KW - Scapulohumeral rhythm
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013782529
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013782529#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101261
DO - 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101261
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40845626
AN - SCOPUS:105013782529
SN - 1413-3555
VL - 29
JO - Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
JF - Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
IS - 6
M1 - 101261
ER -