Abstract
For more than a generation Karl Leyser's influential thesis, which credited Henry I with undertaking a military revolution which made possible the Saxon dynasty's rule of Francia orientalis, has dominated the scholarly literature. According to Leyser, Henry radically reformed the Saxon military by building a large force of heavily armed mounted fighting men. These men provided the means necessary to assure Saxon domination. It is argued here, by contrast, that this Saxon military revolution is a myth and that the continental Saxons, as contrasted to those in England, saw the gradual development of a heavily armed mounted fighting force following their conquest by Charlemagne in 805. The real Saxon military revolution was Henry's creation of the agrarii milites and the building of frontier fortifications.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 186-222 |
| Number of pages | 37 |
| Journal | Early Medieval Europe |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Saxon military revolution, 912-973? Myth and reality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS