Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure

Michael S. Borofsky, Daniel A. Wollin, Thanmaya Reddy, Ojas Shah, Dean G. Assimos, James E. Lingeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has high potential for morbidity or failure. There are limited data regarding risk factors for failure and to our knowledge no published reports of surgical outcomes in patients with prior failed attempts at percutaneous stone removal. Materials and Methods We identified patients referred to 3 medical centers after prior failed attempts at percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze reasons for initial failure and outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Outcomes were compared to those in a prospectively maintained database of more than 1,200 patients treated with a primary procedure. Results Salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in 31 patients. Unsuitable access to the stone was the reason for failure in 80% of cases. Other reasons included infection, bleeding and inadequate instrument availability in 6.5% of cases each. Compared to patients who underwent primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy those treated with salvage were more likely to have staghorn calculi (61.3% vs 31.4%, p <0.01) and a larger maximum stone diameter (3.7 vs 2.5 cm, p <0.01), and require a secondary procedure (65.5% vs 42.1%, p <0.01). There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the remaining demographics or perioperative outcomes. All patients were deemed completely stone free except one who elected observation for a 3 mm nonobstructing fragment. Conclusions Despite the more challenging nature and prior unsuccessful attempts at treatment, the outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy were no different from those of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy when performed by experienced surgeons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)977-981
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume195
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Treatment Failure
Observation
Demography
Databases
Hemorrhage
Morbidity
Infection

Keywords

  • complications
  • kidney
  • nephrolithiasis
  • nephrostomy, percutaneous
  • treatment failure

Cite this

Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy : Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure. / Borofsky, Michael S.; Wollin, Daniel A.; Reddy, Thanmaya; Shah, Ojas; Assimos, Dean G.; Lingeman, James E.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 195, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 977-981.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borofsky, Michael S. ; Wollin, Daniel A. ; Reddy, Thanmaya ; Shah, Ojas ; Assimos, Dean G. ; Lingeman, James E. / Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy : Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure. In: Journal of Urology. 2016 ; Vol. 195, No. 4. pp. 977-981.
@article{04d6ce500ec849df8a3f11a91c928b78,
title = "Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure",
abstract = "Purpose Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has high potential for morbidity or failure. There are limited data regarding risk factors for failure and to our knowledge no published reports of surgical outcomes in patients with prior failed attempts at percutaneous stone removal. Materials and Methods We identified patients referred to 3 medical centers after prior failed attempts at percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze reasons for initial failure and outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Outcomes were compared to those in a prospectively maintained database of more than 1,200 patients treated with a primary procedure. Results Salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in 31 patients. Unsuitable access to the stone was the reason for failure in 80{\%} of cases. Other reasons included infection, bleeding and inadequate instrument availability in 6.5{\%} of cases each. Compared to patients who underwent primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy those treated with salvage were more likely to have staghorn calculi (61.3{\%} vs 31.4{\%}, p <0.01) and a larger maximum stone diameter (3.7 vs 2.5 cm, p <0.01), and require a secondary procedure (65.5{\%} vs 42.1{\%}, p <0.01). There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the remaining demographics or perioperative outcomes. All patients were deemed completely stone free except one who elected observation for a 3 mm nonobstructing fragment. Conclusions Despite the more challenging nature and prior unsuccessful attempts at treatment, the outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy were no different from those of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy when performed by experienced surgeons.",
keywords = "complications, kidney, nephrolithiasis, nephrostomy, percutaneous, treatment failure",
author = "Borofsky, {Michael S.} and Wollin, {Daniel A.} and Thanmaya Reddy and Ojas Shah and Assimos, {Dean G.} and Lingeman, {James E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "195",
pages = "977--981",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

T2 - Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure

AU - Borofsky, Michael S.

AU - Wollin, Daniel A.

AU - Reddy, Thanmaya

AU - Shah, Ojas

AU - Assimos, Dean G.

AU - Lingeman, James E.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Purpose Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has high potential for morbidity or failure. There are limited data regarding risk factors for failure and to our knowledge no published reports of surgical outcomes in patients with prior failed attempts at percutaneous stone removal. Materials and Methods We identified patients referred to 3 medical centers after prior failed attempts at percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze reasons for initial failure and outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Outcomes were compared to those in a prospectively maintained database of more than 1,200 patients treated with a primary procedure. Results Salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in 31 patients. Unsuitable access to the stone was the reason for failure in 80% of cases. Other reasons included infection, bleeding and inadequate instrument availability in 6.5% of cases each. Compared to patients who underwent primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy those treated with salvage were more likely to have staghorn calculi (61.3% vs 31.4%, p <0.01) and a larger maximum stone diameter (3.7 vs 2.5 cm, p <0.01), and require a secondary procedure (65.5% vs 42.1%, p <0.01). There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the remaining demographics or perioperative outcomes. All patients were deemed completely stone free except one who elected observation for a 3 mm nonobstructing fragment. Conclusions Despite the more challenging nature and prior unsuccessful attempts at treatment, the outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy were no different from those of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy when performed by experienced surgeons.

AB - Purpose Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has high potential for morbidity or failure. There are limited data regarding risk factors for failure and to our knowledge no published reports of surgical outcomes in patients with prior failed attempts at percutaneous stone removal. Materials and Methods We identified patients referred to 3 medical centers after prior failed attempts at percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze reasons for initial failure and outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Outcomes were compared to those in a prospectively maintained database of more than 1,200 patients treated with a primary procedure. Results Salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in 31 patients. Unsuitable access to the stone was the reason for failure in 80% of cases. Other reasons included infection, bleeding and inadequate instrument availability in 6.5% of cases each. Compared to patients who underwent primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy those treated with salvage were more likely to have staghorn calculi (61.3% vs 31.4%, p <0.01) and a larger maximum stone diameter (3.7 vs 2.5 cm, p <0.01), and require a secondary procedure (65.5% vs 42.1%, p <0.01). There was no significant difference between the cohorts in the remaining demographics or perioperative outcomes. All patients were deemed completely stone free except one who elected observation for a 3 mm nonobstructing fragment. Conclusions Despite the more challenging nature and prior unsuccessful attempts at treatment, the outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy were no different from those of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy when performed by experienced surgeons.

KW - complications

KW - kidney

KW - nephrolithiasis

KW - nephrostomy, percutaneous

KW - treatment failure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959184842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959184842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.176

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.176

M3 - Article

VL - 195

SP - 977

EP - 981

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -