Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients

Felipe Kazmirczak, Prabhjot S Nijjar, Lei Zhang, Andrew Hughes, Ko Hsuan Amy Chen, Osama Okasha, Cindy M Martin, Mehmet Akcakaya, Afshin Farzaneh-Far, Chetan N Shenoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the safety and the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMR in heart transplant recipients. Methods: To evaluate the safety, we assessed adverse effects in a retrospective matched cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent regadenoson stress CMR matched in a 2:1 ratio to age- and gender-matched non-heart transplant patients. To evaluate the prognostic value, we compared the outcomes of patients with abnormal vs. normal regadenoson stress CMRs using a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, cardiac hospitalization, retransplantation or death. Results: For the safety analysis, 234 regadenoson stress CMR studies were included - 78 performed in 57 heart transplant recipients and 156 performed in non-heart transplant patients. Those in heart transplant recipients were performed at a median of 2.74 years after transplantation. Thirty-four (44%) CMR studies were performed in the first two years after heart transplantation. There were no differences in the rates of adverse effects between heart transplant recipients and non-heart transplant patients. To study the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMRs, 20 heart transplant recipients with abnormal regadenoson stress CMRs were compared to 37 with normal regadenoson stress CMRs. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint compared with a normal regadenoson stress CMR (3-year cumulative incidence estimates of 32.1% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.034). Conclusions: Regadenoson stress CMR is safe and well tolerated in heart transplant recipients, with no incidence of sinus node dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block, including in the first two years after heart transplantation. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR identifies heart transplant recipients at a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number9
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2019

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  • Regadenoson
  • Safety
  • Stress perfusion
  • Vasodilator

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this