Safety and Efficacy of BIND-014, a Docetaxel Nanoparticle Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Karen A. Autio, Robert Dreicer, Justine Anderson, Jorge A. Garcia, Ajjai Alva, Lowell L. Hart, Matthew I. Milowsky, Edwin M. Posadas, Charles J. Ryan, Ryon P. Graf, Ryan Dittamore, Nicole A. Schreiber, Jason M. Summa, Hagop Youssoufian, Michael J. Morris, Howard I. Scher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Preferential delivery of docetaxel to tumors by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted nanoparticles is clinically effective, and the selective reduction of PSMA-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) after treatment has implications for patient selection and disease monitoring. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of BIND-014, a PSMA-directed docetaxel-containing nanoparticle, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of 42 chemotherapy-naive patients with progressing mCRPC after treatment with abiraterone acetate and/or enzalutamide was conducted from June 24, 2013, to June 10, 2016. Intervention: Treatment with BIND-014 at a dosage of 60 mg/m2 was given intravenously on day 1 of 21-day cycles in combination with prednisone until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 recommendations and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% reduction from baseline) and changes in CTC number (from ≥5 to <5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood) (CellSearch). Changes in CTC number based on PSMA expression levels on CTCs were also evaluated (Epic Sciences). Results: Among the 42 patients (81% white), the median age was 66 (range, 50-85) years, and median number of doses received was 6 (range, 1-21). A PSA response was observed in 12 of 40 patients (30%; 95% CI, 18%-45%), measurable disease response in 6 of 19 (32% [95% CI, 15%-54%]), and CTC conversions in 13 of 26 (50%; 95% CI, 32%-68%). Median radiographic progression-free survival was 9.9 (95% CI, 7.1-12.6) months. With use of the Epic Sciences non-EPCAM-based CTC detection platform, CTCs were detected in 16 of 18 patients (89%); 11 of 18 (61%) had CTCs with PSMA expression above the analytical threshold level (PSMA positive) at baseline (range, 0.4-72.4 CTCs/mL). After treatment, PSMA-positive CTCs were preferentially reduced. Treatment-related adverse events included grade 1 or 2 fatigue (29 of 42 patients [69%]), nausea (23 [55%]), neuropathy (14 [33%]), and neutropenic fever (1 [2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that treatment with BIND-014 is active and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. Antitumor activity may be related to PSMA expression levels on CTCs, which suggests that patients who are likely to benefit from this treatment can be identified before treatment is initiated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01812746.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1344-1351
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume4
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
reported consulting for EMD Serono, Pfizer, Orion, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Incyte. Dr Hart reported being on the speakers bureau for Pfizer and Lilly. Dr Milowsky reported receiving research funding from Acerta Pharma; Agensys, Inc; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Incyte; Merck; Pfizer; and Roche/Genentech. Dr Graf and Mr Dittamore reported being employees of EPIC Sciences, Inc. Mr Summa and Dr Youssoufian reported being employees of BIND Therapeutics, Inc. Dr Morris reported being an uncompensated consultant for Bayer and Endocyte, a compensated consultant for Blue Earth Diagnostics and Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, and having received research support via institutional contracts from Endocyte, Bayer, Corcept, Sanofi, and Progenics. Dr Scher reported being a paid consultant for BIND Therapeutics, Inc; Astellas; Clovis Oncology; Ferring Pharmaceuticals; Janssen Research & Development, LLC; Merck; Sanofi Aventis; and WCG Oncology. Dr Scher also reported being a member of the board of directors for Asterias Biotherapeutics and participating in an unpaid industry collaboration with EPIC Sciences, Inc. Funding/Support: BIND Therapeutics, Inc, funded the design and conduct of the study and collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data. This work was supported in part by cancer center support grant P30 CA008748 from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, grant P50 CA92629 from the National Cancer Institute Specialized Programs of Research Excellence in Prostate Cancer (Dr Scher), the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, and the David H. Koch Prostate Cancer Research Fund (Drs Autio, Anderson, Schreiber, Morris, and Scher).

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and Efficacy of BIND-014, a Docetaxel Nanoparticle Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this