Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

  • Karim Fizazi
  • , Josep M. Piulats
  • , M. Neil Reaume
  • , Peter Ostler
  • , Ray Mcdermott
  • , Joel R. Gingerich
  • , Elias Pintus
  • , Srikala S. Sridhar
  • , Richard M. Bambury
  • , Urban Emmenegger
  • , Henriette Lindberg
  • , David Morris
  • , Franco Nolè
  • , John Staffurth
  • , Charles Redfern
  • , María I. Sáez
  • , Wassim Abida
  • , Gedske Daugaard
  • , Axel Heidenreich
  • , Laurence Krieger
  • Brieuc Sautois, Andrea Loehr, Darrin Despain, Catherine A. Heyes, Simon P. Watkins, Simon Chowdhury, Charles J. Ryan, Alan H. Bryce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In a phase 2 study, rucaparib, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), showed a high level of activity in patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer associated with a deleterious BRCA alteration. Data are needed to confirm and expand on the findings of the phase 2 study. Methods: In this randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alteration and who had disease progression after treatment with a second-generation androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI). We randomly assigned the patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or a physician's choice control (docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI [abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide]). The primary outcome was the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival according to independent review. Results: Of the 4855 patients who had undergone prescreening or screening, 270 were assigned to receive rucaparib and 135 to receive a control medication (intention-to-treat population); in the two groups, 201 patients and 101 patients, respectively, had a BRCA alteration. At 62 months, the duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the rucaparib group than in the control group, both in the BRCA subgroup (median, 11.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.69) and in the intention-to-treat group (median, 10.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001 for both comparisons). In an exploratory analysis in the ATM subgroup, the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was 8.1 months in the rucaparib group and 6.8 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.52). The most frequent adverse events with rucaparib were fatigue and nausea. Conclusions: The duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer with rucaparib than with a control medication among patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA alteration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)719-732
Number of pages14
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume388
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by Clovis Oncology . Dr. Abida’s work is supported by a grant (P30-CA008748) from the National Cancer Institute .

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Genetics
  • Genitourinary Cancer
  • Hematology/Oncology
  • Treatments in Oncology
  • Urology/Prostate Disease
  • Urology/Prostate Disease General

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this