TY - JOUR
T1 - Rucaparib in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Alteration
AU - TRITON2 investigators
AU - Abida, Wassim
AU - Patnaik, Akash
AU - Campbell, David
AU - Shapiro, Jeremy
AU - Bryce, Alan H.
AU - McDermott, Ray
AU - Sautois, Brieuc
AU - Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
AU - Bambury, Richard M.
AU - Voog, Eric
AU - Zhang, Jingsong
AU - Piulats, Josep M.
AU - Ryan, Charles J.
AU - Merseburger, Axel S.
AU - Daugaard, Gedske
AU - Heidenreich, Axel
AU - Fizazi, Karim
AU - Higano, Celestia S.
AU - Krieger, Laurence E.
AU - Sternberg, Cora N.
AU - Watkins, Simon P.
AU - Despain, Darrin
AU - Simmons, Andrew D.
AU - Loehr, Andrea
AU - Dowson, Melanie
AU - Golsorkhi, Tony
AU - Chowdhury, Simon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/10
Y1 - 2020/11/10
N2 - PURPOSE BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a BRCA alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor–directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious BRCA alteration who received $ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response ($ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a BRCA alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic BRCA alteration and for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a BRCA2 alteration. The most frequent grade $ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types.
AB - PURPOSE BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a BRCA alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor–directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious BRCA alteration who received $ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response ($ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a BRCA alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic BRCA alteration and for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a BRCA2 alteration. The most frequent grade $ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093842727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093842727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.20.01035
DO - 10.1200/JCO.20.01035
M3 - Article
C2 - 32795228
AN - SCOPUS:85093842727
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 38
SP - 3763
EP - 3772
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 32
ER -