Room modes with regard to speech intelligibility in classrooms: Response to Shalkouhi (2010)

Lawrence L. Feth; Peggy B. Nelson; Richard D. Godfrey; Gail M. Whitelaw

doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0017)

Room modes with regard to speech intelligibility in classrooms: Response to Shalkouhi (2010)

Lawrence L. Feth, Peggy B. Nelson, Richard D. Godfrey, Gail M. Whitelaw

Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To respond to comments by Shalkouhi (2010) on the article "Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms: Predictions and Measurements" by Knecht, Nelson, Whitelaw, and Feth (2002). Method: The Schroeder frequencies calculated by Shalkouhi (2010) were compared with the octave-band weighting factors used by Steeneken and Houtgast (1980) in their calculation of the Speech Transmission Index. Results: To assess the potential impact of invalid reverberation times measured at 125 Hz on speech understanding in the classrooms, we note that the weight given to the octave band at 125 Hz is 0.0. Conclusions: Since the octave band of background noise centered on 125 Hz has no impact on speech understanding, we suggest that reverberation time measures at 125 Hz are unnecessary.

Original language	English (US)
Number of pages	1
Journal	American Journal of Audiology
Volume	19
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0017)
State	Published - Dec 1 2010

Keywords

Classroom acoustics
Reverberation time
Schroeder frequencies
Speech transmission index

Publisher link

10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0017)

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{671dfc9d893b4f61bb3b4eb37a245d1e,

title = "Room modes with regard to speech intelligibility in classrooms: Response to Shalkouhi (2010)",

abstract = "Purpose: To respond to comments by Shalkouhi (2010) on the article {"}Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms: Predictions and Measurements{"} by Knecht, Nelson, Whitelaw, and Feth (2002). Method: The Schroeder frequencies calculated by Shalkouhi (2010) were compared with the octave-band weighting factors used by Steeneken and Houtgast (1980) in their calculation of the Speech Transmission Index. Results: To assess the potential impact of invalid reverberation times measured at 125 Hz on speech understanding in the classrooms, we note that the weight given to the octave band at 125 Hz is 0.0. Conclusions: Since the octave band of background noise centered on 125 Hz has no impact on speech understanding, we suggest that reverberation time measures at 125 Hz are unnecessary.",

keywords = "Classroom acoustics, Reverberation time, Schroeder frequencies, Speech transmission index",

author = "Feth, {Lawrence L.} and Nelson, {Peggy B.} and Godfrey, {Richard D.} and Whitelaw, {Gail M.}",

year = "2010",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0017)",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "19",

journal = "American Journal of Audiology",

issn = "1059-0889",

publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Room modes with regard to speech intelligibility in classrooms

T2 - Response to Shalkouhi (2010)

AU - Feth, Lawrence L.

AU - Nelson, Peggy B.

AU - Godfrey, Richard D.

AU - Whitelaw, Gail M.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To respond to comments by Shalkouhi (2010) on the article "Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms: Predictions and Measurements" by Knecht, Nelson, Whitelaw, and Feth (2002). Method: The Schroeder frequencies calculated by Shalkouhi (2010) were compared with the octave-band weighting factors used by Steeneken and Houtgast (1980) in their calculation of the Speech Transmission Index. Results: To assess the potential impact of invalid reverberation times measured at 125 Hz on speech understanding in the classrooms, we note that the weight given to the octave band at 125 Hz is 0.0. Conclusions: Since the octave band of background noise centered on 125 Hz has no impact on speech understanding, we suggest that reverberation time measures at 125 Hz are unnecessary.

AB - Purpose: To respond to comments by Shalkouhi (2010) on the article "Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms: Predictions and Measurements" by Knecht, Nelson, Whitelaw, and Feth (2002). Method: The Schroeder frequencies calculated by Shalkouhi (2010) were compared with the octave-band weighting factors used by Steeneken and Houtgast (1980) in their calculation of the Speech Transmission Index. Results: To assess the potential impact of invalid reverberation times measured at 125 Hz on speech understanding in the classrooms, we note that the weight given to the octave band at 125 Hz is 0.0. Conclusions: Since the octave band of background noise centered on 125 Hz has no impact on speech understanding, we suggest that reverberation time measures at 125 Hz are unnecessary.

KW - Classroom acoustics

KW - Reverberation time

KW - Schroeder frequencies

KW - Speech transmission index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650460409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650460409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0017)

DO - 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0017)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78650460409

SN - 1059-0889

VL - 19

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

IS - 2

ER -

Room modes with regard to speech intelligibility in classrooms: Response to Shalkouhi (2010)

Abstract

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this