Abstract
Fifth-graders prerated both abstract and concrete nouns for likability, and paired-associate lists were constructed by pairing nouns (liked with liked and disliked with disliked). As predicted, the high self-concept (Piers-Harris Self-Concept Scale) children learned their liked noun pairs more efficiently than their disliked pairs, while the low self-concept children reversed and learned their disliked noun pairs more readily. Further analysis revealed that these self-concept patterns were most pronounced for low-IQ (Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Test) children. High-IQ children, who were superior to low-IQ children in overall learning, showed no preference for their affective evaluations in learning. Increasing task difficulty (e.g., by increasing work abstractness) resulted in a tendency to learn disliked items more readily than liked items. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 406-413 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Educational Psychology |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1978 |
Keywords
- IQ &
- concrete nouns, learning rate, 5th graders
- likability vs dislikability of abstract &
- self concept &
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Role of intelligence and task difficulty in the affective learning styles of children with high and low self-concepts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS