TY - JOUR
T1 - Robust Artificial Intelligence Tool for Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis
T2 - Novel Development Approach Incorporating Both Atrial Electrograms and Surface ECG and Evaluation by Head-to-Head Comparison With Hospital-Based Physician ECG Readers
AU - Zhang, Yuji
AU - Xu, Shusheng
AU - Xing, Wenhui
AU - Chen, Qiong
AU - Liu, Xu
AU - Pu, Yachuan
AU - Xin, Fangran
AU - Jiang, Hui
AU - Yin, Zongtao
AU - Tao, Dengshun
AU - Zhou, Dong
AU - Zhu, Yan
AU - Yuan, Binhang
AU - Jin, Yan
AU - He, Yuanchen
AU - Wu, Yi
AU - Po, Sunny S.
AU - Wang, Huishan
AU - Benditt, David G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2024/2/6
Y1 - 2024/2/6
N2 - BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases risk of embolic stroke, and in postoperative patients, increases cost of care. Consequently, ECG screening for AF in high-risk patients is important but labor-intensive. Artificial intelligence (AI) may reduce AF detection workload, but AI development presents challenges. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a novel approach to AI development for AF detection using both surface ECG recordings and atrial epicardial electrograms obtained in postoperative cardiac patients. Atrial electrograms were used only to facilitate establishing true AF for AI development; this permitted the establishment of an AI-based tool for subsequent AF detection using ECG records alone. A total of 5 million 30-second epochs from 329 patients were annotated as AF or non-AF by expert ECG readers for AI training and validation, while 5 million 30-second epochs from 330 different patients were used for AI testing. AI performance was assessed at the epoch level as well as AF burden at the patient level. AI achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.932 on validation and 0.953 on testing. At the epoch level, testing results showed means of AF detection sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and F1 (harmonic mean of positive predictive value and sensitivity) as 0.970, 0.814, 0.976, 0.776, and 0.862, respectively, while the intraclass correlation coefficient for AF burden detection was 0.952. At the patient level, AF burden sensitivity and positive predictivity were 96.2% and 94.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of both atrial electrograms and surface ECG permitted development of a robust AI-based approach to postoperative AF recognition and AF burden assessment. This novel tool may enhance detection and management of AF, particularly in patients following operative cardiac surgery.
AB - BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases risk of embolic stroke, and in postoperative patients, increases cost of care. Consequently, ECG screening for AF in high-risk patients is important but labor-intensive. Artificial intelligence (AI) may reduce AF detection workload, but AI development presents challenges. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a novel approach to AI development for AF detection using both surface ECG recordings and atrial epicardial electrograms obtained in postoperative cardiac patients. Atrial electrograms were used only to facilitate establishing true AF for AI development; this permitted the establishment of an AI-based tool for subsequent AF detection using ECG records alone. A total of 5 million 30-second epochs from 329 patients were annotated as AF or non-AF by expert ECG readers for AI training and validation, while 5 million 30-second epochs from 330 different patients were used for AI testing. AI performance was assessed at the epoch level as well as AF burden at the patient level. AI achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.932 on validation and 0.953 on testing. At the epoch level, testing results showed means of AF detection sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and F1 (harmonic mean of positive predictive value and sensitivity) as 0.970, 0.814, 0.976, 0.776, and 0.862, respectively, while the intraclass correlation coefficient for AF burden detection was 0.952. At the patient level, AF burden sensitivity and positive predictivity were 96.2% and 94.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of both atrial electrograms and surface ECG permitted development of a robust AI-based approach to postoperative AF recognition and AF burden assessment. This novel tool may enhance detection and management of AF, particularly in patients following operative cardiac surgery.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - atrial electrogram
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - surface ECG
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184288690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85184288690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.123.032100
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.123.032100
M3 - Article
C2 - 38258658
AN - SCOPUS:85184288690
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 13
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 3
M1 - e032100
ER -