Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception

Leonardo Cappello, Naveen Elangovan, Sara Contu, Sanaz Khosravani, Jürgen Konczak, Lorenzo Masia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. Methodology: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. Results: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15° ± 0.43° and 1.52° ± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075° (flexion–extension) and 0.0032° (abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3° (abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were rT2-T1 = 0.986 and rT3-T2 = 0.971. Conclusion: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number198
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume9
Issue numberAPRIL
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 14 2015

Fingerprint

Proprioception
Wrist
Elbow Joint
Feasibility Studies
Robotics
Psychometrics
Healthy Volunteers
Rehabilitation
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Discrimination threshold
  • Quantitative measurements
  • Robotic rehabilitation
  • Wrist proprioception
  • Wrist robot

Cite this

Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception. / Cappello, Leonardo; Elangovan, Naveen; Contu, Sara; Khosravani, Sanaz; Konczak, Jürgen; Masia, Lorenzo.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 9, No. APRIL, 198, 14.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cappello, Leonardo ; Elangovan, Naveen ; Contu, Sara ; Khosravani, Sanaz ; Konczak, Jürgen ; Masia, Lorenzo. / Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. APRIL.
@article{ff812dd6633f40549b30dd8793a9589b,
title = "Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception",
abstract = "Introduction: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. Methodology: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75{\%} correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. Results: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15° ± 0.43° and 1.52° ± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075° (flexion–extension) and 0.0032° (abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3° (abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were rT2-T1 = 0.986 and rT3-T2 = 0.971. Conclusion: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.",
keywords = "Discrimination threshold, Quantitative measurements, Robotic rehabilitation, Wrist proprioception, Wrist robot",
author = "Leonardo Cappello and Naveen Elangovan and Sara Contu and Sanaz Khosravani and J{\"u}rgen Konczak and Lorenzo Masia",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "14",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "APRIL",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception

AU - Cappello, Leonardo

AU - Elangovan, Naveen

AU - Contu, Sara

AU - Khosravani, Sanaz

AU - Konczak, Jürgen

AU - Masia, Lorenzo

PY - 2015/4/14

Y1 - 2015/4/14

N2 - Introduction: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. Methodology: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. Results: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15° ± 0.43° and 1.52° ± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075° (flexion–extension) and 0.0032° (abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3° (abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were rT2-T1 = 0.986 and rT3-T2 = 0.971. Conclusion: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.

AB - Introduction: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test–retest reliability over repeated testing. Methodology: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject’s response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test–retest reliability. Results: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15° ± 0.43° and 1.52° ± 0.36° for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075° (flexion–extension) and 0.0032° (abduction–adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2°(flexion–extension) and 0.3° (abduction–adduction). Reliability coefficients were rT2-T1 = 0.986 and rT3-T2 = 0.971. Conclusion: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.

KW - Discrimination threshold

KW - Quantitative measurements

KW - Robotic rehabilitation

KW - Wrist proprioception

KW - Wrist robot

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933674418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933674418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198

M3 - Article

C2 - 25926785

AN - SCOPUS:84933674418

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

IS - APRIL

M1 - 198

ER -